CHARACTERISTICS OF HILL-SACHS LESIONS IN PATIENTS WITH ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the morphology and dimensions of Hill-Sachs lesions on two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) in patients with anterior shoulder instability.
Subjects and methods: A cohort study was conducted in 75 patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability treated at Military Hospital 175 from August 2022 to December 2025. On 2D CT, lesion width, depth, Hill-Sachs angle, bicipital angle and glenoid diameter were recorded; on 3D CT, the Hill-Sachs interval, glenoid track width and on-track/off-track status were evaluated.
Results: The mean Hill-Sachs width and depth on 2D CT were 11.34 ± 3.62 mm and 6.99 ± 2.07 mm, respectively. Moderate-width lesions (10-20 mm) accounted for 58.7%, and lesions 5-8 mm in depth accounted for 60.0%. The mean Hill-Sachs angle was 27.5 ± 12.4°, the bicipital angle 125.0 ± 8.6° and the mean glenoid diameter 28.3 ± 2.1 mm. On 3D CT, the mean Hill-Sachs interval was 13.6 ± 2.8 mm and the mean glenoid track width 19.5 ± 1.9 mm; 72 of 75 patients (96.0%) had on-track and 3 (4.0%) off-track lesions.
Conclusion: Hill-Sachs lesions in this cohort were predominantly of moderate size. Combined 2D and 3D CT assessment provides complementary morphological information, and on-track/off-track classification is useful for evaluating potential engagement and treatment planning.
Keywords
Hill-Sachs lesion, anterior shoulder instability, computed tomography, glenoid track
Article Details
References
2. Maio M., Sarmento M., Moura N., et al. (2019). How to measure a Hill-Sachs lesion: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev, 4(4): 151-157.
3. Yamamoto N., Itoi E., Abe H., et al. (2007). Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 16(5): 649-656.
4. Di Giacomo G., Itoi E., Burkhart S.S. (2014). Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from “engaging/non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/off-track” lesion. Arthroscopy, 30(1): 90-98.
5. Aydıngöz Ü., Yıldız A.E., Huri G. (2023). Glenoid track assessment at imaging in anterior shoulder instability: rationale and step-by-step guide. Radiographics, 43(8): e230030.
6. Ozaki R., Nakagawa S., Mizuno N., et al. (2014). Hill-Sachs lesions in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability: evaluation using computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 42(11): 2597-2605.
7. Kodali P., Jones M.H., Polster J., et al. (2011). Accuracy of measurement of Hill-Sachs lesions with computed tomography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 20(8): 1328-1334.
8. Cho S.H., Cho N.S., Rhee Y.G. (2011). Preoperative analysis of the Hill-Sachs lesion in anterior shoulder instability: how to predict engagement of the lesion. Am J Sports Med, 39(11): 2389-2395.
9. Rutgers C., Verweij L.P.E., Priester-Vink S., et al. (2022). Recurrence in traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations increases the prevalence of Hill-Sachs and Bankart lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 30(6): 2130-2140.