Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 05/05/2021
Abstract Views: 308
Views PDF: 1117
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v498i2.193
Issue
Vol. 498 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Đình Minh, N., Thanh Vân , N., & Thanh Dũng, L. (2021). CORONARY CALCIFICATION SCORE AND STENOSIS ON 256-SLICE MSCT IMAGING. Vietnam Medical Journal, 498(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v498i2.193

CORONARY CALCIFICATION SCORE AND STENOSIS ON 256-SLICE MSCT IMAGING

Nguyễn Đình Minh, Nguyễn Thanh Vân , Lê Thanh Dũng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objects: Study the relation of calcification score and coronary stenosis on 256-slice CT. Materials and Methods: cross-sectional-decritive study in 150 patients diagnosed of coronary diseases had coronary artery angiogram on 256-slice CT at Vietduc friendship hospital from 1/7 to30/7/2020.  Results: : including 75 male and 75 female, mean ages was 65.1±11.92. There was 86/150(57.3%) cases having coronary calcification with mean calcification score of 351.2±529.47 (from 1 to 2652). Mean score of <60 aged group was 46.5±144.35 and 274.2±504.28 in 60 and over aged group (p=0.003). Mean calcification score of 50% and over stenosis was 691.9±674.61 and under 50% stenosis was 117.4±173.58 (p<0.001). The ROC showed the correlation of calcification score and ≥50% stenosis had AUC of 0.829 (95%CI: 0.740 -0.919) with p<0.001. The cut-off calcification score was 196 with Sensitivity=0.706 and 1-Specificity=0.173. Conclusion: Coronary calcification score had correlation with stenosis then be possible to predict the coronary events in the future.

Article Details

Keywords

coronary calcification, coronary disease, CT-Scanner

References

1. Church TS, Levine BD, McGuire DK, LaMonte MJ, FitzGerald SJ, Cheng YJ, et al (2007). Coronary artery calcium score, risk factors, and incident coronary heart disease events. Atherosclerosis;190(1):224–31.
2. Schuhbaeck A, Schmid J, Zimmer T, Muschiol G, Hell MM, Marwan M, et al (2016). Influence of the coronary calcium score on the ability to rule out coronary artery stenoses by coronary CT angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 10(5): 343–50.
3. Gambre AS, Liew C, Hettiarachchi G, Lee SSG, MacDonald M, Kam CJW, et al (2018). Accuracy and clinical outcomes of coronary CT angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a single-centre study in Singapore. Singapore Med J;59(8):413–8.
4. Zreik M, van Hamersvelt RW, Wolterink JM, Leiner T, Viergever MA, Isgum I. A. (2019). Recurrent CNN for Automatic Detection and Classification of Coronary Artery Plaque and Stenosis in Coronary CT Angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging;38(7):1588–98.
5. Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ (2003). Prognostic Value of Cardiac Risk Factors and Coronary Artery Calcium Screening for All-Cause Mortality. Radiology;228(3):826–33.
6. Malguria N, Zimmerman S, Fishman EK (2018). Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Current Status and Review of Literature. J Comput Assist Tomogr;42(6):887-97.
7. Van Dijk JD, Shams MS, Ottervanger JP, Mouden M, van Dalen JA, Jager PL (2017). Coronary artery calcification detection with invasive coronary angiography in comparison with unenhanced computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis [Internet];28(3): 246-52.
8. Plank F, Burghard P, Friedrich G, Dichtl W, Mayr A, Klauser A, et al (2016). Quantitative coronary CT angiography: absolute lumen sizing rather than %stenosis predicts hemodynamically relevant stenosis. Eur Radiol;26(11):3781–9.