SURVEILLANCE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS’ SATISFACTION WITH DIFFERENT FORMS OF SEVOFLURANE IN VIETNAM

Công Quyết Thắng, Đỗ Văn Dũng, Nguyễn Thị Thu Thủy, Nguyễn Vũ Lan Chi, Phạm Anh Tuấn, Nguyễn Đức Nam, Phạm Thị Minh Thư, Nguyễn Thị Hồng Nhi, Nguyễn Thị Kim Hiệp, Nguyễn Văn Tiến, Vũ Văn Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Sevoflurane is one of the most common used anesthetic agents. The satisfaction of medical staffs with sevoflurane forms in Vietnam is an important criterion in drug selection. Objectives: Survey of health professionals’ satisfaction with available forms of sevoflurane in Vietnam. Methods: The multi-center study investigated the satisfaction of anesthesiologists and anesthesia technicians towards sevoflurane’s different forms in 5 hospitals in Vietnam. Overall satisfaction for a particular drug was assessed based on satisfaction index and importance index on each criterion for each respective drug on a 5-level Likert scale. Results: Surveying 96 anesthesiologists and 118 anesthesia technicians, the study noted that the satisfaction score for brand name sevoflurane was higher than generic drug for both anesthesiologists (4.29 versus 3.67, p = 0.000) and anesthesia technicians (3.83 versus 3.17, p = 0.000). Considering each individual criterion, a similar picture is also noted, except for the criterion of drug price, in which there is no statistical difference in satisfaction score between sevoflurane brand-name and generic in both anesthesiologists and anesthesia technicians. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists and anesthesia technicians' satisfaction with the brand-name sevoflurane was higher than generic in all criteria (except for drug price) and overall score.

Article Details

References

1. Livertox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury (2014) "Drug Record: Sevoflurane", U.S. National Library of Medicine
2. Nandalan S. P., Eltringham R. J. , Fan Q. W. (2005). Cost-effectiveness of basal flow
sevoflurane anaesthesia using the Komesaroff vaporizer inside the circle system. Anaesth Intensive Care, 33(5): p. 609-15.
3. Byon H. J., et al. (2015). An open-label comparison of a new generic sevoflurane formulation with original sevoflurane in patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Clin Ther, 37(4): p. 887-901.
4. Yamakage M., et al. (2007). Analysis of the composition of 'original' and generic sevoflurane in routine use. Br J Anaesth, 99(6): p. 819-23.
5. Portella A. A., et al. (2010). A double-blind comparative study between Generic Sevoflurane and Sevorane™. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 60(5): p. 466-74.
6. Yasny J. S. and White J. (2012). Environmental implications of anesthetic gases. Anesth Prog, 59(4): p. 154-8.
7. Baker M. T. (2007). Sevoflurane: Are there differences in products ?. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 104(6): p. 1447-1451.
8. Grigoroudis E. and Spyridaki O. (2003). Derived vs. stated importance in customer satisfaction surveys. Operational Research, 3: p. 229-247.