Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 13/03/2022
Abstract Views: 159
Views PDF: 106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v510i2.1991
Issue
Vol. 510 No. 2 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Thúy Hồng, V. ., & Đình Hải, T. . (2022). A COMPARISON OF TRACING TRADITIONAL CEPHALOMETRIC FILMS AND V-CEPH SOFTWARE METHOD. Vietnam Medical Journal, 510(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v510i2.1991

A COMPARISON OF TRACING TRADITIONAL CEPHALOMETRIC FILMS AND V-CEPH SOFTWARE METHOD

Võ Thị Thúy Hồng1,, Trịnh Đình Hải2
1 Hanoi Central Odonto-Stomatology Hospital
2 Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective was to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between tracing traditional Cephalometric film method and tracing method on computor with V-Ceph software. Methodology of clinical trial studied on 123 Cephalometric films. The results showed that 17 of 21 indexes had ICC greater than 0.75, except for A-NPerp index, facial axis angle index, GoGn-SN index, and nasolabial angle index. Conclusion: Tracing traditional Cephalometric film method and film tracing with V-Ceph software have high correlation, most of the measured indexes have ICC >0.75.

Article Details

Keywords

tracing traditional films, V-Ceph software, Cephalometric films, intraclass correlation coefficient

References

1. Celik E, Polat-Oz soy, Toygar Memikoglu TU, “Comparison of Cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis”, Eu.J.Orthod. 2009, Jun,31(3): 241-6.
2. Georgios Tsorovas and Agneta Linder-Aronson Karsten, “A comparison of hand-tracing and cephalometric analysis computer programs with and without advanced features- accuracy and time demands”, European Journal of Orthodontics, 2010, Volume 32, 721-728.
3. Gregston M, Kula T, Hardman P, et al, “A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: Hard tissue landmarks”, Semin Orthod 10:204-211, 2004.
4. Huja SS, Grubaugh EL, Rummel AM, Fields HW, Beck FM, “Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions”, Angle Orthod, 2009 May;79(3):428-35.
5. Mustafa Erkan, Hakan Gurcan Gurel, Metin Nur and Baris Demirel, “Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs”, European Journal of Orthodontics, Volume 34, Issue 3 .P. 318-321.
6. Nouri M, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Hamidiaval SH, Hemmati SH, “Differences in Cephalometric analysis measurements: A comparison of computerized versus hand- tracing methods”, J Dent Sch 2011, 29(2), 77-84.
7. S.S Huja, E.L. Grubaugh, A.M. Rummel, H.W. Field, F.M.Beck, “ Comparison of Hand-Traced and Computer-Based Cephalometric Superimpositions”, Angle Orthod, 2009;79:428-435.
8. SF AlBarakati, KS Kula and AA Ghoneima, “The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods”, Dentomaxillofac Radiology, 2012, 41,11-17.