Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 05/05/2021
Abstract Views: 677
Views PDF: 320
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v498i2.202
Issue
Vol. 498 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Văn Quảng, L. ., Quốc Duy, N. ., Thế Đường, L. ., Đức Toàn, T., Văn Trọng, N. ., & Xuân Quý, N. . (2021). OUTCOMES OF SUBMENTAL FLAP RECONSTRUCTION FOR ORAL DEFECTS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ORAL CANCER. Vietnam Medical Journal, 498(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v498i2.202

OUTCOMES OF SUBMENTAL FLAP RECONSTRUCTION FOR ORAL DEFECTS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ORAL CANCER

Lê Văn Quảng, Ngô Quốc Duy, Lê Thế Đường, Trần Đức Toàn, Nguyễn Văn Trọng, Ngô Xuân Quý

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives:  To evaluate the result of OCC treatment using nasolabial flap reconstruction. Patients and methods: 25 cases of carcinoma of oral cavity who had undergone excision and reconstruction using a submental flap between January 2015 and March 2020. Results: The mean age was 56,4±10,3. Male/Female was 7,3/1. In total 25 patients, there were 17 floor of the mouth cancer patients, 4 buccal mucosa cancer patients, 3 tongue cancer patients, and 1 lower gingiva cancer patient. The mean tumor size was 31,2±8,0 mm. The mean length of flap was 42,8±7,9mm, and the mean width was 30,2±6,8mm. Flap survival was 88% and partial necrosis occurred in 3 patients (12%). The postoperative speech and swallowing function were good and intermediate level. Conclusion: Submental flap is simple and viable option in the reconstruction of small to medium oral defects after excision of oral cancer with good functional outcome and minimal complications.

Article Details

Keywords

oral cavity cancer, reconstruction, submental flaps

References

1. DeVita V.T., Lawrence T.S., and Rosenberg S.A. (2015). DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s cancer: Principles & practice of oncology: Tenth edition. DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology: Tenth Edition, 1–2280.
2. Martin D, Pascal J F, Baudet J, et al (1993).Thesubmentalislandflap: a new donor site. Anatomy and clinical applications as a free or pedicled flap. Plast Reconstr Surg;92(5):867-873.
3. Sittitrai P., Srivanitchapoom C., Reunmakkaew D., et al (2017). Submental island flap reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients with level I lymph node metastasis. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 55(3), 251-255.
4. Howard B. E., Nagel T. H., Donald C. B., et al (2014). Oncologic safety of the submental flap for reconstruction in oral cavity malignancies. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, 150(4), 558-562.
5. Wang J., Tan Y., Shen Y., et al (2020). Oncological safety of submental island flap for reconstruction of pathologically node-negative and node-positive T1–2 oral squamous cell carcinoma-related defects: A retrospective study and comparison of outcomes. Oral Oncology, 102, 104507.
6. Cariati P., Serrano A. C., Fernandez A. M., et al (2018). Is submental flap safe for the oncological reconstruction of the oral cavity?. Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, 119(4), 284-287.
7. Faisal M., Adeel M., Riaz S., et al (2018). The submental island flap in head and neck cancer. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 8(2), 287.
8. Sebastian P., Thomas S., Varghese B. T., et al (2008). The submental island flap for reconstruction of intraoral defects in oral cancer patients. Oral oncology, 44(11), 1014-1018.
9. Chow T. L., Kwan W. W., Fung S. C., et al (2018). Reconstruction with submental flap for aggressive orofacial cancer-an updated series. American journal of otolaryngology, 39(6), 693-697.