Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 15/04/2022
Abstract Views: 134
Views PDF: 114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v511i1.2062
Issue
Vol. 511 No. 1 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Thúy Hồng, V. ., & Đình Hải, T. . (2022). LOCATION AND RELATIONSHIP OF IMPACTED TEETH WITH ADJACENT STRUCTION ON CBCT FILM. Vietnam Medical Journal, 511(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v511i1.2062

LOCATION AND RELATIONSHIP OF IMPACTED TEETH WITH ADJACENT STRUCTION ON CBCT FILM

Võ Thị Thúy Hồng1,, Trịnh Đình Hải2
1 Hanoi Central Odonto-Stomatology Hospital
2 Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: to determine the position of impacted teeth in three-dimensional space in the jawbone and in comparison with adjacent teeth . Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study on 30 CBCT films of patients with impacted teeth. Results: 73.3% of the crown of impacted teeth were located on vestibule, the shortest distance from the jaw bone surface to impacted teeth was 1.13 ±0.83mm. The crown of impacted teeth on palatal vault were 26.7%, the shortest distance from the bone surface to impacted tooth was 0.83±0.26mm. The range of angle which created the occlusion plane and impacted teeth was 40º-100º (51.69º±32.87º). 23.3% impacted teeth caused resorption of adjacent teeth. Conclusion: The position of the impacted tooth and the degree of resorption of the adjacent root caused by the impacted tooth are clearly identified on CBCT film.

Article Details

Keywords

impacted teeth, CBCT film

References

1. Nguyễn Phú Thắng (2012), Nghiên cứu phẫu thuật hỗ trợ quá trình chỉnh nha các răng vĩnh viễn mọc ngầm vùng trước, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, tr. 75 -80.
2. Bjerklin K, Ericson S (2006). How a computerized tomography examination changed the treatment plans of 80 children with retained and ectopically positioned maxillary canines. Angle Orthodontist. 76, pp. 43 – 51.
3. Chu, F. C. S., Li, T. K. L., et al (2003). Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies-a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 9(3), 158-163.
4. Ericsson. S., Kurol (1988). Resorption of maxillary lateral incisors caused by ectopic eruption of the canines. A clinical and radiographic analysis of predisposing factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthod. 84:503-13.
5. Knight H (1987). Tooth resorption associated with the eruption of maxillary canines. British Journal of Orthodontics. 14, pp. 21 – 31.
6. Nagahara, K., Yuasa, S. et al. (1989). [Etiological study of relationship between impacted permanent teeth and malocclusion]. Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi, 27(4), 913-924.
7. Liu D.G, Zhang W.L et al (2008). Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics. 105, pp. 91 – 98.
8. Snehlata O., (2011) CBCT evaluation of impacted canines and root resorption. Oral surgery.21-24.
9. Susanne W., Jennifer J., et al (2011). Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop 73.28-40.