COST-EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF BRENTUXIMAB VEDOTIN IN TREATING CLASSICAL HODGKIN LYMPHOMA PATIENT RELAPSED/PROGRESSED POST AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANT

Vũ Quỳnh Mai1,, Nguyễn Minh Văn1, Hoàng Văn Minh1
1 Hanoi University of Public Health

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In Vietnam, annually, there are 651 new cases and 251 cases of mortality due to Hodgkin Lymphoma, with 90% of cases are classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Currently, brentuximab vedotin (BV) is approved as a salvage treatment for those relapsing/progressing and clinical efficacy of BV has been proven in clinical trials. However, the accessibility is still limited due to the treatment expensive cost. Thus, an economic evaluation for Vietnamese context is necessary. Methods: Partitioned survival model was used in this study to stimulate cost and treatment benefits of using BV compared to traditional chemotherapies. The model utilized inputs from published clinical trial results, Vietnamese sources for cost inputs and verified with clinical opinions. Results: Base case analysis estimated that using BV will cost 399,975,378 VND per patient, increases 1.33 life years and 0.32 quality-adjusted life years. ICER ratios are 22,505,267/LY and 925,845,119/QALY. Conclusions: In comparison with traditional chemotherapies, using BV for CHL post-ASCT relapse/progress patients is not cost-effectiveness in Vietnam. However, as BV treatment cost is the biggest barrier for patients, Vietnamese Health Insurance should consider reimbursing BV to improve equality in healthcare accessibility for relapsed/progressed CHL patients.

Article Details

References

1. Bộ Y Tế. Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị một số bệnh lý huyết học. Published online April 22, 2015.
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Hodgkin Lymphoma Guidelines Version (3) 2021. Accessed March 21, 2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/hodgkins.pdf
3. Younes A, Gopal AK, Smith SE, et al. Results of a Pivotal Phase II Study of Brentuximab Vedotin for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(18):2183-2189. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0410
4. Chen R, Gopal AK, Smith SE, et al. Five-year survival and durability results of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2016;128(12):1562-1566. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-02-699850
5. Swinburn P, Shingler S, Acaster S, Lloyd A, Bonthapally V. Health utilities in relation to treatment response and adverse events in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(6):1839-1845. doi:10.3109/10428194.2014.970542
6. Ramsey SD, Roth J, Carlson J. Estimated Cost-Effectiveness of Brentuximab Vedotin Vs. Best Supportive Care Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(2, Supplement):S146. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.11.688
7. Engstrom A. PCN145 - The Cost-Effectiveness of Brentuximab Vedotin in Hodgkin Lymphoma in Sweden. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A639. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2303