Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 21/04/2022
Abstract Views: 341
Views PDF: 212
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v511i2.2114
Issue
Vol. 511 No. 2 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hồng Quang, L. ., & Văn Đức, N. . (2022). RESULTS OF BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY USING ONCOPLASTIC TECHNIQUES WITH TUMOURSLOCATED IN THE LOW-DENSITY BREAST AREA. Vietnam Medical Journal, 511(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v511i2.2114

RESULTS OF BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY USING ONCOPLASTIC TECHNIQUES WITH TUMOURSLOCATED IN THE LOW-DENSITY BREAST AREA

Lê Hồng Quang1,, Nguyễn Văn Đức1
1 K Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the oncologic safety and aesthetic results after breast-conserving surgery using oncoplastic techniques with tumours located in the low-density breast area. Methods: Combined retrospective andprospective descriptionstudy in23stages I, II breast cancer patientswith tumours located in the low-density breast area who underwent breast-conserving surgery at K Hospital from 2017 to 2020. Results: Positive frozen resection margin rate was 13,1%, no patient had to have reoperation. The average duration of hospitalization was 6,1 days. The complication rate after surgery was 8,7%. Excellent and good cosmetic results were 95,7%. The satisfaction rate was 100%. Conclusion: Using the oncoplastic techniques in breast-conserving surgery in the low-density breast areabrang good aesthetic results, oncologic safety, and had a low complication rate.

Article Details

Keywords

breast-conserving surgery, oncoplastic techniques, the low-density breast area

References

1. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., et al. (2002). Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 347(16), 1227–1232.
2. Bodilsen A., Bjerre K., Offersen B.V., et al. (2016). Importance of margin width in breast-conserving treatment of early breast cancer. J Surg Oncol, 113(6), 609–615.
3. Chan S., Chen J.-H., Li S., et al. (2017). Evaluation of the association between quantitative mammographic density and breast cancer occurred in different quadrants. BMC Cancer, 17(1), 274.
4. Lowery J.C., Wilkins E.G., Kuzon W.M., et al. (1996). Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg, 36(6), 601–606; discussion 607.
5. Clough K.B., Oden S., Ihrai T., et al. (2013). Level 2 oncoplastic surgery for lower inner quadrant breast cancers: the LIQ-V mammoplasty. Ann Surg Oncol, 20(12), 3847–3854.
6. Clough K.B., Kaufman G.J., Nos C., et al. (2010). Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol, 17(5), 1375–1391.
7. Yang J.D., Lee J., Cho Y., et al. (2012). Surgical Techniques for Personalized Oncoplastic Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients with Small- to Moderate-Sized Breasts (Part 1): Volume Displacement. Journal of breast cancer, 15, 1–6.
8. Munhoz A.M., Montag E., Arruda E.G., et al. (2006). Superior-medial dermoglandular pedicle reduction mammaplasty for immediate conservative breast surgery reconstruction: technical aspects and outcome. Ann Plast Surg, 57(5), 502–508.