VALUE OF SPECIFIC SIGNS ON MRI IN DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN INTRADURAL - EXTRAMEDULLARY SPINAL SCHWANNOMAS AND MENINGIOMAS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Our study aimed to investigate the specific signs on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in providing useful data to differentiate between intradural - extramedullary schwannomas and meningiomas. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 42 patients with intradural - extramedullary schwannomas and 18 patients with intradural - extramedullary meningiomas. All patients had undergone spinal MRI prior to surgery at Vietduc University hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam, from July 2019 to December 2021. Results: Patients with schwannoma showed significantly higher frequency of cystic change sign (SE 64.3%, SP 100%, PPV 100%), neural foraminal widening sign (SP 94.4% và PPV 92.3%); patients with meningioma showed significantly higher frequency of dural tail sign (SP 97.6%, PPV 90.9%, NPV 83.7%) (p<0.05). Conclusion: cystic change sign, neural foraminal widening sign, dural tail sign were useful in differentiating between intradural extramedullary schwannomas from meningiomas. Cystic change sign, neural foraminal widening sign were significantly common in intradural - extramedullary schwannomas; dural tail sign was significantly common in meningiomas.
Article Details
Keywords
Schwannomas, Meningiomas, cystic change sign, dural tail sign, neural foraminal widening sign, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
References
2. Lee JH, Kim HS, Yoon YC, Cha MJ, Lee SH, Kim ES. Differentiating between spinal schwannomas and meningiomas using MRI: A focus on cystic change. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(5): e0233623. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233623
3. Takashima H, Takebayashi T, Yoshimoto M, et al. Differentiating spinal intradural-extramedullary schwannoma from meningioma using MRI T2 weighted images. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1092):20180262. doi:10.1259/bjr.20180262
4. Liu WC, Choi G, Lee SH, et al. Radiological findings of spinal schwannomas and meningiomas: focus on discrimination of two disease entities. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(11):2707-2715. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1466-7
5. Iwata E, Shigematsu H, Yamamoto Y, et al. Preliminary algorithm for differential diagnosis between spinal meningioma and schwannoma using plain magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 2018;23(2):408-413. doi:10.1016/j.jos.2017.11.012
6. Chen JC, Tseng SH, Chen Y, Tzeng JE, Lin SM. Cervical dumbbell meningioma and thoracic dumbbell schwannoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005; 107(3):253-257. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.06.012
7. Cohen-Gadol AA, Zikel OM, Koch CA, Scheithauer BW, Krauss WE. Spinal meningiomas in patients younger than 50 years of age: a 21-year experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2003;98(3):258-263. doi:10.3171/spi.2003.98.3.0258
8. Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Neoplasms: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation | RadioGraphics. Accessed April 5, 2021. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.2019180200
9. Wippold FJ, Lubner M, Perrin RJ, Lämmle M, Perry A. Neuropathology for the neuroradiologist: Antoni A and Antoni B tissue patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1633-1638. doi:10.3174/ ajnr.A0682