Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 26/04/2022
Abstract Views: 197
Views PDF: 120
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v512i2.2266
Issue
Vol. 512 No. 2 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Anh Đào, L. ., Tuấn Đạt, Đỗ ., & Tài Đức, N. . (2022). CHARACTERISTICS OF ISTHMOCELE 12 WEEK POST CESAREAN SECTION AT HANOI OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 512(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v512i2.2266

CHARACTERISTICS OF ISTHMOCELE 12 WEEK POST CESAREAN SECTION AT HANOI OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY HOSPITAL

Lê Thị Anh Đào1,, Đỗ Tuấn Đạt1, Nguyễn Tài Đức2
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Hanoi Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Features of cesarean scar defect after 12 week - cesarean section at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. Methods: This prospective study  included 136 patients with their first cesarean section at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital from July 2020 to July 2021. Results: The prevalence of isthmocele after 12 week - cesarean section is 30.3%. Most of cases are small scar and triangular scar. The surgical time in the group of no isthmocele patients and isthmocele are 18,9518 ± 5,38 vs 20,763 ± 6,55, respectively. The labor duration  in the group of no isthmocele patients and isthmocele are 7,11± 3,82 vs 9,8 ± 1,3, respectively. Conclusion: Longer surgery time and prolonged labor duration are independent factors of isthmocele. The risk of isthmocele in the double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision is the same as those in the sinlge-layer closure.

Article Details

Keywords

cesarean scar defect, isthmocele

References

1. Vervoort AJMW, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJK, Brölmann H a. M, Mol BWJ, Huirne J a. F. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2015;30(12):2695-2702. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev240
2. Kremer TG, Ghiorzi IB, Dibi RP. Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Rev Assoc Medica Bras 1992. 2019;65(5):714-721. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.714
3. Park IY, Kim MR, Lee HN, Gen Y, Kim MJ. Risk factors for Korean women to develop an isthmocele after a cesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):162. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1821-2
4. B MV, C R. Cesarean scar defect and its association with clinical symptoms, uterine position and the number of cesarean sections. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(10):4091-4096. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204293
5. Wang CB, Chiu WWC, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(1):85-89. doi:10.1002/uog.6405
6. Kamel R, Eissa T, Sharaf M, Negm S, Thilaganathan B. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(3):466-470. doi:10.1002/uog.22053
7. Hanacek J, Vojtech J, Urbankova I, et al. Ultrasound cesarean scar assessment one year postpartum in relation to one- or two-layer uterine suture closure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(1):69-78. doi:10.1111/aogs.13714
8. Bij de Vaate AJM, Brölmann H a. M, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne J a. F. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(1):93-99. doi:10.1002/uog.8864