TO ASSESS SOME ADVERTISING EFFECTS OF PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS RENAL LITHOTRIPSY SURGERY

Phạm Quang Minh1,, Nguyễn Xuân Anh2
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Tâm Anh Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Proseal laryngeal mask ensures good ventilation for many types of surgery, however, for the lateral position surgery, anesthesiologistare concerned about the effect on pulse, blood pressure as well as complications such as sore throat, hoarseness of voice after surgery compare with endotracheal tube. We conducted a prospective randomized clinical intervention study at Vinh Phuc General Hospital from February to August 2020, 60 patients undergoing percutaneous renal lithotripsy were divided into 2 groups. Results: the 2 groups were similar in terms of anthropometric indices and surgery time. SpO2 and EtCO2 were within normal limit and were similar at all the time of study in both groups, the difference was not statistically significant with p > 0.05. The laryngeal mask group had pouls, blood pressure that was more stable at the time of insertion as well as extubation compare with the endotracheal group, the difference was statistically significant with p < 0.05. Postoperative complications such as sore throat, hoarseness in laryngal mask group were also lower than those of endotracheal group. In the endotracheal group, there were 12 patients with sore throat and 1 patient with hoarseness after surgery. However, these symptoms were not severe and  did not last long. Conclusion: the laryngeal mask group had some advantages such as stabilizing pulse, blood pressure and lowering symptoms of sore throat and hoarseness after surgery than the endotracheal group in percutaneous renal lithotripsy surgery.

Article Details

References

1. Alan R. Aitkenhead, Graham Smith (1996), Preoperative Assessment and Premedication, Texbook of Anaesthesia, 3 Edition, pp 3, 91 -98.
2. Brimacombe J (2004), LMA-Proseal an analysis of current knowledge and a complete practical guide, The Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, pp2-104.
3. Trần Thị Kiệm, Nguyễn Thụ (2007), Nghiên cứu vai trò của phương pháp gây mê bằng Propofol kết hợp đặt mask thanh quản ProSeal trong phẫu thuật tai – xương chũm, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, Hà Nội.
4. Nguyễn Thanh Tú và cs, So sánh biến đổi về tuần hoàn và hô hấp khi gây mê bằng mask thanh quản Proseal với nội khí quản trong gây mê phẫu thuật cắt gần hoàn toàn tuyến giáp, Tạp chí Y học- Quân sự, Số 4, 2012.
5. Bimla Sharma et al. Proseal laryngeal mask airway: A study of 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2003, 47 (6), pp.467-472.
6. Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hương (2011), Đánh giá hiệu quả và sự an toàn của mask thanh quản Proseal và Supreme so với ống nội khí quản trong gây mê phẫu thuật nội soi cắt túi mật, Báo cáo khoa học Hội nghị gây mê trong phẫu thuật nội soi toàn quốc.
7. Maltby J. R et al (2002), Gastric distension and ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: LMA-Classic vs tracheal intubation, Can J anesth, 47(7): 622-626.
8. Belena JM, MD, Nunez M (2012), The laryngeal mask airway Supreme™: safety and efficacy during gynaecological laparoscopic surgery, South Afr J Anaesth Analg, 18(3): 143 -147.