Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 21/06/2022
Abstract Views: 190
Views PDF: 112
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v514i2.2617
Issue
Vol. 514 No. 2 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Gia Du, H. ., & Đức Hoàng, N. (2022). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SURGICAL BY PLIF/TLIF O-ARM AMONG PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 514(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v514i2.2617

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SURGICAL BY PLIF/TLIF O-ARM AMONG PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

Hoàng Gia Du1,, Nguyễn Đức Hoàng1
1 Bach Mai Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical by TLIF O-arm among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Results: There were 47 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were recruited for the study. Nearly half of the study subjects have waist defects. The most common is spondylolisthesis on the L4L5 floor (33 patients, accounting for 70.2%), then on the L5S1 floor (16 patients, accounting for 34%). After surgery, VAS scores on the back and legs were lower than before surgery (p-value <0.05). Regarding the physical symptoms, the number of patients with sensory disturbances and Lasègue Test-Positive decreased clearly. significantly after surgery (p-value <0.05). Regarding the degree of slip assessed by X-ray, nearly 30 patients with grade 1 slipped before surgery, while grade 3 had the least number of patients at surgery (p-value <0.05). Conclusion: Our study has shown the effectiveness of surgery in pain relief. We also evaluated the outcomes of radiographic imaging.

Article Details

Keywords

lumbar spondylolisthesis, TLIF O-arm, effectiveness, surgery

References

1. Smith J.D., Jack M.M., Harn N.R. và cộng sự. (2016). Screw Placement Accuracy and Outcomes Following O-Arm-Navigated Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Feasibility Study. Global Spine J, 6(4), 344–349.
2. Sembrano J.N., Santos E.R.G., và Polly D.W. (2014). New generation intraoperative three-dimensional imaging (O-arm) in 100 spine surgeries: does it change the surgical procedure?. J Clin Neurosci, 21(2), 225–231.
3. Võ Văn Thanh (2014), Kết quả điều trị trượt đốt sống thắt lưng L4-L5 bằng phẫu thuật lấy đĩa đệm, cố định cột sống, ghép xương liên thân đốt, Luận văn tốt nghiệp Bác sỹ nội trú, Trường Đại học y HN.
4. Sakaura H., Yamashita T., Miwa T. và cộng sự. (2013). Symptomatic adjacent segment pathology after posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Global Spine J, 3(4), 219–224.
5. Farrokhi M.R., Rahmanian A., và Masoudi M.S. (2012). Posterolateral versus posterior interbody fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Neurotrauma, 29(8), 1567–1573.
6. Wang Y., Chen K., Chen H. và cộng sự. (2019). Comparison between free-hand and O-arm-based navigated posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly cohorts with three-level lumbar degenerative disease. Int Orthop, 43(2), 351–357.
7. Faundez A.A., Mehbod A.A., Wu C. và cộng sự. (2008). Position of interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: effect on 3-dimensional stability and sagittal lumbar contour. J Spinal Disord Tech, 21(3), 175–180.
8. Nguyễn Bá Hậu (2009), Đánh giá kết quả điều trị trượt đốt sống thắt lưng bằng cố định cột sống lối sau và ghép xương liên thân đốt, Luận văn thạc sỹ, Đại học Y Hà Nội.