THE CHANGE OF SOME COAGULATION INDICES IN SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS

Đỗ Mạnh Hùng1,, Phạm Thái Dũng1, Trần Văn Tùng1
1 Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluation of changes in some coagulation indices, SIC score and DIC score in dead and survivor group of septic shock patients. Materials and method: Prospective Descriptive Study on 60 septic shock patients treated in the Center of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Clinical Toxicology - 103 Military Hospital - Vietnam Military Medical University. Results: Platelet count in the dead group was the highest value at the beginning of study (168±128.6 G/l), then tended to gradually decrease over time and reached the lowest value on the 7th day (77±60.8 G/l). Platelet count at the 3rd, 5th and 7th day of the dead group was lower than that of the survivor group, p<0.05. The SIC score at the 3rd, 5th, 7th day and the DIC score on the 3rd, 5th day of the dead group higher than that of the survivor group, p<0.05. The SIC score had quite good and good predictive values for mortality on the 3rd, 5th, 7th day with AUC of 0.726, 0.872, 0.827, respectively. The DIC score had weak and quite good predictive values for mortality on the 3rd, 5th day with AUC of 0.699 and 0.781, respectively. Conclusions: Platelet count in the dead group tended to decrease over time. Compared with the survivor group, the dead group had a lower platelet count, a higher SIC score on the 3rd, 5th, 7th day and a higher DIC score on the 3rd, 5th day. The SIC score and DIC score had predictive values for mortality in septic shock patients.

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Thủy. Đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và một số yếu tố liên quan đến kết quả điều trị bệnh nhân sốc nhiễm khuẩn tại bệnh viện TW Thái Nguyên. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2021, Tập 498, số 1, Tr 149-152.
2. Helms J. et al. Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients. Annals of Intensive Care. 2020, Vol 10, page 92
3. Jiang L. et al. Prognostic values of procalcitonin and platelet in the patient with urosepsis. 2021, Vol 100, page e26555.
4. Iba T. et al. Advance in the Management of Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. Journal of Clinical medicine. 2019, Vol 8, page 728.
5. Iba T. et al. New criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) following the revised sepsis definition: a retrospective analysis of a nationwide survey. BMJ Open. 2017, Vol 7, page e017046-e017046.
6. Shankar-Hari M. et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016, Vol 315, page 775-787.
7. Yao L. et al. Analysis of Prognostic Risk Factors of Sepsis Patients in Intensive Care Unit Based on Data Analysis. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2022, Vol 2022, page 3746640.
8. World Health Organization. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions. 2020