COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS WITH THE ICARE REBOUND TONOMETER AND THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Comparison of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with the ICare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Methods: We conducted a pilot clinical study in 134 eyes of 134 patiens. IOP was measured using ICare tonometer and Goldmann tonometer, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0. Results: The mean IOPs by RT and GAT were 15.80 ± 3.52 mmHg and 14.99 ± 2.80 mmHg, respectively. The mean age was 21.57 ± 1.44. The ratio of men to women is 1/1. Measurement results of two tonometers have a positive correlation (r=0.666, p<0.01). The difference in measurement results between two types of tonometers increased with the higher IOP (p=0.293). Conclusion: The ICare tonometer with its compact and convenient advantages can be considered a reliable alternative for screening programs with similar measurement results.
Article Details
Keywords
Intraocular pressure, Goldmann tonometer, ICare tonometer
References
2. Foster PJ He M và cs (2005), "Angle-closure glaucoma in East Asian and European people", Different diseases Eye, tr. 3-12.
3. Kontiola Al (2000), "A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure".
4. Nakakura S và cs (2019), "Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer".
5. Melina Pahlitzsch (2016), “Comparison of ICare and IOPen vs Goldmannn applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients”, Int J Ophthalmol, 9(11), tr. 1624–1628].
6. Halil Huseyin Cagatay và cs (2014), “Comprasion of ICare Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in High Myopia”.