COMPARING THE ANESTHETIC MAINTENANCE EFFICACY OF DESFLURANE AND SEVOFLURANE IN ANESTHESIA FOR THE TREATMENT OF DENTAL PULPITIS IN CHILDREN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Comparing the anesthetic maintenance efficacy of desflurane and sevoflurane in anesthesia for the treatment of dental pulpitis in children was carried out on 60 patients aged 3 - 6 years old under anesthesia for pulpitis treatment at the National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ha Noi from 6-2029 to 11-2029, randomly divided into 2 the group. Group S (n = 30): maintain anesthesia with sevoflurane, group D (n = 30) maintain anesthesia with desflurane. Evaluation was based on the following criteria: general characteristics, anesthetic concentration (%), anesthetic gas volume (ml), level of sedation according to RASS, pain level according to NIPE, proportion of patients with abnormal movements according to the criteria. Ellis, time to extubate, rate of patients with vomiting, nausea at time points T0: face up to induce anesthesia, T1: After intubation, T2: Time to start treatment, T3 – 7: When the treatment is 20, 40, ... 120 minutes, Tx: at the end of the treatment, turn off the anesthetic gas. The results showed that, general characteristics, volume of anesthetic gas, level of sedation, level of pain, proportion of patients with abnormal movements in group D were not significantly different (with p > 0.05) compared with group S. The time of extubation, the rate of vomiting and nausea in group D were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than in group S. So that’, using desflurane to maintain anesthesia in anesthesia treatment of dental pulpitis in children gives good anesthetic effect. The desflurance group had earlier recovery and extubation time, and a lower proportion of patients with nausea and vomiting than sevoflurane.
Article Details
Keywords
Pediatric anesthesia, pulpitis, desflurane, sevoflurane
References
2. Bùi Thị Thúy Nga (2013). Nghiên cứu so sánh gây mê bằng sevofluranee và desfluranee trong phẫu thuật sỏi mật, Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học, Đại học Y Hà Nội, Hà Nội.
3. Ellis (1996), Response to intravenous midazolam sedation in general dental practice, Br Dental J, 180: pp 417 – 420.
4. Welborn, Hannallah, Norden, Ruttimann (1996). Comparison of Emergence and Recovery Characteristics of Sevoflurane, Desflurane, and Halothane in Pediatric Ambulatory Patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia: November 1996 - Volume 83 - Issue 5 - p 917-920.
5. Cohen IT, Finkel JC, Hannallah RS, Hummer KA, Patel KM. The effect of fentanyl on the emergence characteristics after desflurane or sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:1178-81.
6. Sessler CN, Grap MJ, Brophy GM. Multidisciplinary management of sedation and analgesia in critcal care. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 22(2): 211-26.