PYLORUS PRESEVING PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY AT BACH MAI HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Subject: Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Aims: the results of Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for diseases of the head of pancreas and periambulla at Bach Mai hospital. Material and methods: descriptive retrospective study of 75 patients were underwent pylorus preserving pancreatic coduodenectomy at the General Surgery Department, Bach Mai Hospital in the period from 2015 – 2020. Results: 75 cases with diseases of the head pancreas and periampullary area that male/female 49/26 and mean age: 56,5 (26- 80). In 75 patients that Pylorus preserving pancreatic coduodenectomy were performed, there are tumor of pancreatic head 31 cases (41,3%), of Vater ampullary 30 cases (40%) of the lower commen bill duct 11 cases (14,7%), of the duodenum 3 cases (4,0%) . The mean operative time was 265 ±32,3 minutes, the mean hospital stay was 12,7 days.The perioperative mortality rate was 4,0 % due to pancreatic fistula. The perioperative morbidity rate was 18,6%. among those biliary fistula 5,3%, delayed gastric emptying 6,6% and abcess intrabdoment 2,6%. Conclusion: Pyloris-preserving pancreatic codoudenectomy is a safe technique to shorten surgery time, do not have post-gastrointestinal syndrome, fast recovery after surgery. Pancreatic fistula was major problem with mortality after Pylorus preserving pancreatic coduodenectomy. Pre- op preparation with good selected cases and expert surgeon could help to reduce the perioperative morbidity rate.
Article Details
Keywords
Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreticoduodenectomy Traverso-longmire
References
2. Văn Tần. Lê Bá Hùng (2015), “chỉ định và lợi ích phẫu thuật Whipple cải tiến điều trị bệnh lý vùng mật – tụy – tá tràng”, Y học thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
3. Diener MK, Fitzmaurice C, Schwarzer G et al (2015), “Pylorus-preserving pancreati coduodenectomy (ppWhipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classicWhipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma”, The Cochrane Library, 11, 1-58.
4. Gouma DJ, Nieveen van Dijikum EJ, Obetop H (1999), “The standard diagnostic work - up and surgical treatment of pancreatic head tomors “, Eur j Surg Oncol , 25,113 – 123
5. Khe T.C. Tran, Hans G. Smeenk, Casper H. J. Van Eijck, et al (2004), “pylorus preserving panceaticoduodenectomy versus standard Wihpple proceduce” Annals of Sugery, 5, 240, 738 – 745.
6. Malleo G., Crippa S., Butturini G. et al (2010). Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: validation of International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification and analysis of risk factors. HPB, 12(9), pp. 610-618.
7. Traverso L.W. (1980). “Preservation of the pylorus in pancreatoduodenectomy: a follow up evaluation”, Vol. 192, pp. 306-311
8. Tran K.T., Smeenk H.G., van Eijck C.H. et al (2004). Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors. Annals of surgery, 240(5), pp. 738.