BEHAVIOR OF USING FACE MASKS AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS AND RELATED FACTORS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN THE 2nd EPIDEMIC WAVE IN HO CHI MINH CITY, VIETNAM

Phạm Lê An1,2,, Trần Ngọc Đăng2,3, Đỗ Thị Hoài Thương2, Nguyễn Thị Minh Trang3, Nguyễn Trường Viên4, Nguyễn Thị Tường Vy5, Nguyễn Thị Thu Thảo2, Trần Bảo Vy2, Lâm Sơn Bảo Vi4, Nguyễn Tấn Tiến6,7, Trần Diệp Tuấn3
1 Family Medicine Training Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
2 Grant and Innovation Center (GIC), University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
3 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
4 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City
5 Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical Research, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
6 National key Laboratory of Digital Control and System Engineering (DCSELab), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam National University - HCMC
7 Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam National University - HCMC

Main Article Content

Abstract

A cross-sectional study to describe the use of face masks by medical staff during the second wave of epidemics at frontline hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) from June to October 2020 with a self-completed questionnaire. The results recorded that 204 health workers participated in the survey and the total rate was 99% of health workers using medical masks, and all health workers believed that using medical masks could help prevent COVID-19 infection. A few health workers have a subjective mentality about the risk of COVID-19 disease, although the percent of worrying about the consequences if infected is still high. The results also show that the leading cause of the barrier to wearing a mask is feeling short of breath and having itching and skin irritation when wearing a mask (accounting for about two-thirds). In addition, factors such as crowd psychology and hospital rules about wearing masks will help increase the awareness of mask-wearing compliance in hospitals.

Article Details

References

1. WHO. Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). SITUATION REPORT - 1; 21 JANUARY 2020. 2020 07/11/2021]; Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4.
2. WHO. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2022 11/04/2022]; Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
3. Bộ Y Tế. CỔNG THÔNG TIN CỦA BỘ Y TẾ VỀ ĐẠI DỊCH COVID-19. 2021 04/04/2022]; Available from: https://covid19.gov.vn/.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Guidance for the Use of Masks to Control Seasonal Influenza Virus Transmission. 2019 07/11/2021]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/maskguidance.htm.
5. Chu, D.K., et al., Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 2020. 395(10242): p. 1973–1987.
6. Becker Mh Fau - Haefner, D.P., et al., Selected psychosocial models and correlates of individual health-related behaviors. Medical care, 1977. 15(5 SUPPL): p. 27–46.
7. Jones, P., et al., Global adoption of personal and social mitigation behaviors during COVID-19: The role of trust & confidence. PLoS One, 2021. 16(9): p. e0256159.
8. Szepietowski, J.C., et al., Face Mask-induced Itch: A Self-questionnaire Study of 2,315 Responders During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acta Derm Venereol, 2020. 100(10): p. adv00152.
9. Techasatian, L., et al., The Effects of the Face Mask on the Skin Underneath: A Prospective Survey During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Prim Care Community Health, 2020. 11: p. 2150132720966167.