Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 17/10/2022
Abstract Views: 305
Views PDF: 225
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v519i1.3584
Issue
Vol. 519 No. 1 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Huy Hoàng, P. ., Phú Thắng, N. ., Văn Việt, Đàm ., & Tiến Đạt, B. . (2022). MAXILLARY SINUS LIFT USING LATERAL WINDOW APPROACH WITH BONE GRAFT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Vietnam Medical Journal, 519(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v519i1.3584

MAXILLARY SINUS LIFT USING LATERAL WINDOW APPROACH WITH BONE GRAFT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Phan Huy Hoàng1,, Nguyễn Phú Thắng2, Đàm Văn Việt3, Bùi Tiến Đạt1
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 The Odonto-Stomatology Training Institute, Hanoi Medical University
3 Hanoi Central Odonto-Stomatology Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To assess and evaluate the effectiveness of bone grafting materials in maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) procedures applying the lateral window technique. Subjects and methods: The systematic review was carried out on 3 websites of Pubmed, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, limited from 2000-2020. Articles were selected if they met the criteria (1) Implant failure rate among graft materials, (2) use of 2 or more types of bone graft materials, (3) Use lateral sinus lift approach. Evaluation of research quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. Results:  Out of 5558 selected articles, 6 studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Meta analysis evaluating the success rate of implants between demineralized bone material and other types of bone graft materials shows OR= 1.12; 95% CI=0.61-2.04 (contains value 1) which indicates there is no difference in success rate between demineralized bone material and other graft materials. Conclusion: Demineralized bone material has been proven to be as effective as other bone graft materials in bone grafting sinus lift surgery, helping patients reduce costs and limit autologous bone removal surgery. In order to determine the timing of implant placement after bone grafting as well as implant’s loading time, more studies are needed to establish a complete surgical procedure for demineralized bone material.

Article Details

Keywords

Lateral window approach, bone substitutes, dental implant

References

1. Davis D.M., Fiske J., Scott B., Radford D.R. The emotional effects of tooth loss: A preliminary quantitative study. Br. Dent. J. 2000;188:503–506. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800522.
2. Gaviria L, Salcido JP, Guda T, Ong JL. Current trends in dental implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;40:50–60. doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.50.
3. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980 Aug;38(8):613-6
4. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986 Apr; 30 (2):207-29.
5. Jensen, T., Schou, S., Stavropoulos, A., Terheyden, H., & Holmstrup, P. (2011). Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(3), 263–273.
6. Jensen, T., Schou, S., Gundersen, H. J. G., Forman, J. L., Terheyden, H., & Holmstrup, P. (2012). Bone-to-implant contact after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios in mini pigs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24(6), 635–644.