THE LEVEL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND ULTRASOUND IN THE DETECTION OF SOME FETAL BRAIN ABNORMALITIES

Đoàn Tiến Lưu1,, Nguyễn Thị Hồng Nhung1
1 Hanoi Medical University Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: assess the level of agreement between magnetic resonance and ultrasound in the detection of some fetal brain abnormalities. Methods: prospective cohort on 66 cases with diagnosis or suspicion of fetal brain abnormalities at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. the data is analyzed and processed by medical statistical method, using SPSS 20.0 software. Results: 98 abnormalities out of a total of 66 cases. MRI Fetal could detect more other abnormalities that ultrasound missed. MRI and ultrasound were partially discordant in 12 (12.24%) abnormalities, completely discordant in 24 abnormalities (24.5%), and concordant in 62 of 98 abnormalities (63.26%). The level of agreement between MRI and ultrasound was almost perfect in ventriculomegaly and cystic lesions with the κ values 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The level of agreement between MRI and ultrasound was weakest in hemorrhage with κ value 0 (none agreement) and cortical abnormalities with κ value 0.46 (weak agreement). Conclutions: Magnetic resonance is of great value in detecting cranial abnormalities in the fetus, especially cortical developmental abnormalities and focal hemorrhage. MRI could detect more other abnormalities which ultrasound limited evaluation.

Article Details

References

1. Ceausescu A, Docea A, Dinu M, Degeratu S, Iliescu D, Cara M. Fetal Central Nervous System Abnormalities. Congenital Anomalies - From the Embryo to the Neonate. Published online April 6, 2018. doi:10.5772/intechopen.76208
2. Todros T, Capuzzo E, Gaglioti P. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Images Paediatr Cardiol. 2001;3(2):3-18. Accessed June 26, 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC3232499/
3. Reddy UM, Filly RA, Copel JA. Prenatal Imaging: Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112(1):145-157. doi:10.1097/ 01.AOG.0000318871. 95090.d9
4. MRI of the Fetal Brain: Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies. Radiology. 2005; 235(2):568-568. doi:10.1148/radiol.2351052504
5. Griffiths PD, Bradburn M, Campbell MJ, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities: the MERIDIAN diagnostic accuracy study. Health Technol Assess. 2019;23(49):1-144. doi:10.3310/hta23490
6. Malinger G, Kidron D, Schreiber L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of malformations of cortical development by dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(2):178-191. doi:10.1002/uog.3906
7. Raafat RME, Abdelrahman TM, Hafez MAF. The prevalence and the adding value of fetal MRI imaging in midline cerebral anomalies. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s43055-020-0146-0
8. Paladini D, Quarantelli M, Sglavo G, et al. Accuracy of neurosonography and MRI in clinical management of fetuses referred with central nervous system abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(2):188-196. doi:10.1002/ uog.13243
9. Sefidbakht S, Dehghani S, Safari M, Vafaei H, Kasraeian M. Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Two-Year Experience. Iran J Pediatr. 2016;26(4). doi:10.5812/ijp.4589