Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 10/02/2023
Abstract Views: 265
Views PDF: 118
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v520i1B.3855
Issue
Vol. 520 No. 1B (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Ngô , T. H., & Hồ X. H. (2023). TREATMENT RESULTS OF PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY COMBINED SCLERAL BUCKLE FOR PATIENTS WITH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT. Vietnam Medical Journal, 520(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v520i1B.3855

TREATMENT RESULTS OF PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY COMBINED SCLERAL BUCKLE FOR PATIENTS WITH RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT

Thị Huyền Ngô 1,, Xuân Hải Hồ 2
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Central Eye Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate treatment results of pars plana vitrectomy combined and scleral buckle for patients with rhegmatogenous detachment. Methods: A cross sectional study of 38 patients (38 eyes) with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment of Vietnam National Hospital of Ophthalmology from July 1st, 2021 to July 31st, 2022. Results: Mean follow up was  3 months.Single surgery anatomical success rate was 94.7%, overall success rate was 100%.At the time of last follow up, 63.2% of the eyes had visual acuity 20/200 or better, 21.1% had visual acuity 20/400 to 20/200, 15.8% has visual acuity <20/400. Conclusion: pars plana vitrectomy combined scleral buckle has with high rates of anatomical success and visual success in treatment rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Article Details

Keywords

rhegmatogenous detachment, pars plana vitrectomy combined and scleral buckle.

References

1. D. Mitry et al. (2010). The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94(6): 678-84.
2. Philip Storey. Pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy alone for patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment at high risk for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. RETINA. 2014;34:1945–1951.
3. Hồ Xuân Hải. Đặc điểm lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị bong võng mạc trên mắt đã đặt thể thủy tinh nhân tạo. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, Hà Nội. 2017.
4. SPR Study Group. View 2: the case for primary vitrectomy.Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:784–7.
5. Falkner-Radler, C. I., Graf, A., & Binder, S. Vitrectomy combined with endolaser or an encircling scleral buckle in primary retinal detachment surgery: a pilot study. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2015; 93(5): 464–469.
6. Sachin Meht. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol. 2011;46(3):237-241.
7. Lindsell, L., Sisk, R., Miller, D., Foster, R., Petersen, M., Riemann, C., & Hutchins, R. Comparison of outcomes: scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy versus vitrectomy alone for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016; Volume 11: 47–54.
8. Kreissig I. Prognosis of return of macular function after retinal reattachment. Mod Probl Ophthalmol.1977;18:415–29.
9. Gundry MF, Davies EWG. Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77: 310–4.
10. Anderson DH, Stern WH, Fisher SK, Erickson PA, Borgula G.: Retinal detachment in the cat: the pigment epithelial photoreceptor inter- face. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983; 24: 906–926.