RESULTS OF MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT PANCREATIC INJURY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Study aim: Restrospective study to evaluate clinic features and the results of medical treatment of injury to the neck, body, tail of the pancreas. Patient and method: Retrospective study. Time: Jannuary 2011-december 2016. Results: There were 28 patients of pancreatic injury were observed in Việt-Đức hospital. The mean age was 32,7, male 82,1%, female 17,9%. Reasons for pancreatic traumatisme: Traffic accident 60,7%, Labour accident 14,3%, others 25%. Abdominal CTScaner was performed in all the patients (100%) and detected the pancreatic lesions in 28 patients (100%). There were 22/28 patients (78,6%) had good result, 8 patients had pancreatic pseudocyst post traumatism, of them, 6 patients were operated by internal drainage (anastomosis gastro- pancreatic pseudocyst);2 others patient had smal pseudocyst (< 3cm), and had no clinic symptom were observed. The the average duration of hospital stay:14,39 ± 16,93 (day). Conclusion: We conclude that. - Pancreatic Injury to the left of superior mesenteric artery (include: neck, body, tail of pancreas) had good results by medical treatment and observation. The successful propotion is 78,6% (of 28 patients with grade I, II, III of pancreatic injury arcording to AAST). - The pancreatic injury could become pancretic pseudocyst post medical treatment. (all the position: neck,body, tail of pacreas). Good results could be obtained by performing gastro-pancreatic pseudocyst annastomosis (about 2 months post injury). in our study, 6 of 28 patients had pancreatic pseudocyst post medical treatment. (of them: 3 patients had neck pancreatic injury, 2 patients had body pancreatic injury,1 had tail injury) All of them had gastro-pancreatic pseudocyst anastomosis operation and had good results. - The average hospital duration:14,39±16,93(day). - There was no death post operation.
Article Details
Keywords
Pancreatic injury, gastro-pancreatico pseudocyst anastomosis
References
2. Thái Nguyên Hưng, Đậu Đình Luận (2017): Đánh giá kết quả chẩn đoán và điều trị chấn thương thân đuôi tụy; Y học thực hành số 9 (1057); 93-96.
3. Trịnh Văn Tuấn và CS (2006), Nghiên cứu chẩn đoán,chỉ định,xử trí và đánh giá kết quả sớm sau phẫu thuật cắt khối tá tụy do chấn thương, Ngoại khoa 4(56),105-112.
4. Chambon jp. La tomodensitometre de L'abdomen dans 8 cas de traumatisme pancreatique. Ann Chir 1990, 44: 575-80.
5. Heitsch RC: Delineation of cliniccal factors in the treatment of pancreatic injuries. Surgery 1976; 80: 539-9
6. Jordan GL. Traumatic transection of the pancreas. South MedJ, 968; 62:90-3.
7. Nortth WF, Simmons RL. Pacreatic trauma: A review. Surgery 1972; 71: 27-43
8. Patton JH et al. Pancreatic trauma: A simplified management guideline. J Trauma 1997; 43: 243-41.