THE SITUATION OF LYMPH NODE METASTASIS AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH SOME HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA

Tài Tiến Nguyễn1, Trung Thọ Lê1,
1 Hanoi medical university

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Gastric cancer is popular cancer in the world. Prognosis depends on the histopathological type as well as the stage of metastasis. The study aims to determine the status of lymph node metastasis and its relationship with some histopathological features of gastric carcinoma. Methods: This cross-sectional study included two hundred twenty-two patients with gastric carcinoma whose diagnosed by histopathology of surgical specimens in Tan Trieu Facility - Vietnam National Cancer Hospital. The relationship between lymph node metastasis and histopathological features of gastric carcinoma was determined by a chi-square test with statistical significance p<0,05. Results: In the total of two hundred twenty-two patients, there were 7 subtypes of histopathology. Tubular gastric adenocarcinoma (64.86%) was the most popular subtype, followed by poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma (27.93%). Along with that, 62.16% had lymph node metastasis. N0 (37.84%) was the most stage lymph node metastasis, followed by N2 (19.37%), N3a (18.47%), N1 (17.57%) and N3b (6.76%). There was a covariate relationship between tumor staging, macroscopy features, vessel invasion, and nerve invasion with lymph node metastasis (p<0.05). There was no relationship between subtypes of histopathology, location and size of the tumor with lymph node metastasis (p>0.05). Conclusions: gastric cancer had a high rate of lymph node metastasis. There was a covariate relationship between tumor staging, macroscopy features, vessel invasion, and nerve invasion with lymph node metastasis.

Article Details

References

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492
2. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76(2):182-188. doi:10.1111/his.13975
3. Laurén P. THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA: An Attempt at a Histo-Clinical Classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64(1):31-49. doi:10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31
4. Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Arndt V. Epidemiology of stomach cancer. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2009;472:467-477. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-492-0_23
5. Đỗ Trường Sơn. Phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị ung thư dạ dày tại khoa phẫu thuật tiêu hóa Bệnh viện Việt Đức. Tạp Chí Học Việt Nam. 2014;5(1).
6. Marrelli D, Roviello F, De Stefano A, et al. Prognostic Significance of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 Preoperative Serum Levels in Gastric Carcinoma. Oncology. 1999;57(1):55-62. doi:10.1159/000012001
7. Li X, Liu S, Yan J, et al. The Characteristics, Prognosis, and Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018;2018:1-7. doi:10.1155/2018/6945743
8. Nguyễn Tiến Bình. Đánh giá tình trạng di căn hạch của ung thư dạ dày pT1,pT2 tại bệnh viện K. Tạp Chí Học Việt Nam. 2022;511(2):218-221.