Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 19/02/2023
Abstract Views: 616
Views PDF: 264
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v522i1.4251
Issue
Vol. 522 No. 1 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, Ánh D., & Vũ, T. K. (2023). ASSESSMENT OF COLD POLYPECTOMY BELOW 10MM, COMPARISON WITH HOT POLYPECTOMY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 522(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v522i1.4251

ASSESSMENT OF COLD POLYPECTOMY BELOW 10MM, COMPARISON WITH HOT POLYPECTOMY

Ánh Dương Nguyễn1,, Trường Khanh Vũ2
1 Bach Mai hospital
2 Tam Anh hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Initial assessment of cold polypectomy below 10mm, comparison with hot polypectomy. Method: A prospective descriptive study on 106 patients from the Center for Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Bach Mai Hospital, from May 2022 to August 2022. Results: 54/106 patients performed the cold polyp removal method. The mean polyp size of cold polypectomy was smaller than that of hot polypectomy (5.80±1.30 vs 7.67±1.82, p<0.0001). Cold polypectomy is mainly performed on flat, elevated lesions lesions -IIa (79.6%). 100% of cases of cold polypectomy did not need submucosal injection compared to the hot polypectomy group, the rate was 78.9% (p<0.0001). Clips prevented bleeding and perforation complications higher in the hot polypectomy group than in the cold polypectomy group (38.5% vs 3.7%, p<0.0001). In the study, there were no complications of late bleeding or perforation after polypectomy. Conclusion: Cryosection of cold polypectomy is safe in the small polyp group (5-10mm), less need to use lifting tools, and clips than in the hot polypectomy.

Article Details

Keywords

cold polypectomy, hot polypectomy, colonoscopy, small polyp

References

1. Ferlitsch, M., Moss, A., Hassan, C. et al. (2017), "Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline", Endoscopy. 49(3), 270-297.
2. Horiuchi, A., Nakayama, Y., Kajiyama, M. et al. (2014), "Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy", Gastrointest Endosc. 79(3), 417-23.
3. Ichise, Y., Horiuchi, A., Nakayama, Y. et al. (2011), "Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps", Digestion. 84(1), 78-81.
4. Kawamura, T., Takeuchi, Y., Asai, S. et al. (2018), "A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study)", Gut. 67(11), 1950-1957.
5. Lee, J. (2016), "Resection of Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps: What Is the Optimal Technique?", Clin Endosc. 49(4), 355-8.
6. Løberg, M., Kalager, M., Holme, Ø et al. (2014), "Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal", N Engl J Med. 371(9), 799-807.
7. Moon, H. S., Park, S. W., Kim, D. H. et al. (2014), "Only the size of resected polyps is an independent risk factor for delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: a 10-year single-center case-control study", Ann Coloproctol. 30(4), 182-5.
8. Pohl, H., Srivastava, A., Bensen, S. P. et al. (2013), "Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study", Gastroenterology. 144(1), 74-80.e1.
9. Repici, A., Hassan, C., Vitetta, E. et al. (2012), "Safety of cold polypectomy for <10mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study", Endoscopy. 44(1), 27-31.
10. Tanaka, S., Saitoh, Y., Matsuda, T. et al. (2021), "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps", J Gastroenterol. 56(4), 323-335.