COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF HORMONE THERAPIES FOR BREAST CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Thy Nhạc Vũ Hoàng1,, Thị Như Quỳnh Lê1, Đỗ Hồng Nhung Nguyễn1, Thị Ngọc Vân Trần1
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Hormone therapy is a novel method of treating breast cancer by slowing or stopping the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors by blocking the body's ability to produce hormones or blocking hormone effects. Objective: This study aimed to systematically review studies that evaluate the cost-effectiveness of hormone therapy, in order to provide evidence-based information to policymakers in choosing breast cancer treatments. Method: Pubmed, SpringerLink, HINARI, and ProQuest databases were searched comprehensively for this systematic review. This study collected and summarized CEA findings and economic evaluation components published during the period of 2015-2022. Results: Of the 21 selected studies, 11 (52.5%) examined hormone therapy combined with other drugs, while 10 appraised hormone therapy alone. In 52.5% of the studies, the population was postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2 metastatic or advanced breast cancer. Most studies were conducted in the US and Europe, from healthcare provider perspectives (38.2%). In most studies, hormone therapy alone was shown to be cost-effective, while combined hormone therapy was found to be not cost-effective when compared to their respective comparators. Conclusion: Breast cancer treatment with these hormone therapies is generally more expensive and can be a huge financial burden for not only patients but also society. Financial aid is necessary to enlarge access and affordability for breast cancer patients.

Article Details

References

1. World Health Organization (2021). Cancer. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer.
2. Tuyen D Q, Dung T V (2019). Breast Self-Examination: Knowledge and Practice Among Female Textile Workers in Vietnam. Cancer Control, 26(1).
3. Van Minh H, Van Thuan T, Shu X O (2019). Scientific Evidence for Cancer Control in Vietnam. Cancer Control, 26 (1), pp. 1073274819866450.
4. American Cancer Society (2019). Breast cancer facts & figures 2019-2020. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures-2019-2020.pdf.
5. Bộ Y tế (2020). Ban hành tài liệu chuyên môn “Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư vú. Quyết định 3128/QĐ-BYT ngày 17 tháng 07 năm 2020 của Bộ trưởng Bộ Y tế, Hà Nội.
6. Lertjanyakun V, Chaiyakunapruk N, Kunisawa S, et al. (2018). Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Endocrine Therapies in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japan. Pharmacoeconomics, 36 (9), p. 1113-1124.
7. Matter-Walstra K, Ruhstaller T, Klingbiel D, et al. (2016). Palbociclib as a first-line treatment in oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer not cost-effective with current pricing: a health economic analysis of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Breast Cancer Res Treat, 158 (1), p. 51-57.
8. Xie J, Hao Y, Zhou Z Y, et al. (2015). Economic Evaluations of Everolimus Versus Other Hormonal Therapies in the Treatment of HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer From a US Payer Perspective. Clin Breast Cancer, 15 (5), p. e263-276.
9. Zeeshan Butt S F H, Shumaila A, Muhammad RK, et al. (2012). Breast cancer risk factors: a comparison between pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. Journal Of Pakistan Medical Association, 62 (2), p. e120.
10. Zhang J, Huang Y, Wang C, et al. (2017). Efficacy and safety of endocrine monotherapy as first-line treatment for hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 96 (33), pp. e7846.