EFFECTIVENESS OF CIRCUIT CLASS THERAPY FOR IMPROVING BALANCE AND WALKING ABILITY IN ISCHEMIC STROKE

Thị Thùy Nhung Nguyễn1,, Văn Minh Phạm1, Thị Hồng Gấm Trần2
1 Hanoi medical university
2 Hanoi rehabilitation hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of circuit class. Therapy (CCT) and individual physiotherapy (PT) sessions in improving walking ability and functional balance for people recovering from stroke. Design: Nonrandomized, single-blind controlled trial. Setting: Medical rehabilitation ward of Ha Noi rehabiliation hospital. Participants: 41 persons receiving inpatient rehabilitation after a stroke. Interventions: Subjects received group circuit class therapy or individual treatment sessions as the sole method of PT service delivery for the duration of their inpatient stay. Main Outcome Measures: Ten-meter walk test (10MWT), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) measured 3 weeks after admission. Secondary outcome measures included patient satisfaction. Measures were taken on admission and 3 weeks later. Results: Subjects in both groups showed signifificant improvements between admission and week 3 in all primary outcome measures. There were signifificant between group differences in the primary outcome measures at week 3 (10MWT mean difference, .06 m/s; p =0.001; BBS mean difference 1.5 points, p = 0.005, TUG test mean difference 1.86 s; p= 0.008). A signifificantly higher proportion of subjects in the circuit class therapy group were satisfified with the amount of therapy received (P < .01). Conclusions: Circuit class therapy appeared more effective than individual PT sessions for this sample of subjects receiving inpatient rehabilitation poststroke. Favorable results for circuit classes in terms of increased walking independence and patient satisfaction suggest this model of service delivery warrants further investigation.

Article Details

References

1. Khảo sát thực trạng bệnh nhân liệt nửa người do đột quỵ não tại Bệnh viện Y học Cổ truyền Cao Bằng. Accessed October 9, 2022. https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/index.php/vmj/article/view/162/67
2. Ada L, Mackey F, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabilitation: Does the therapy area provide a physical challenge? Aust J Physiother. 1999; 45(1):33-38.
3. Bonini-Rocha AC, de Andrade ALS, Moraes AM, Gomide Matheus LB, Diniz LR, Martins WR. Effectiveness of Circuit-Based Exercises on Gait Speed, Balance, and Functional Mobility in People Affected by Stroke: A Meta-Analysis. PM&R. 2018;10(4):398-409.
4. Edzie EKM, Gorleku PN, Dzefi-Tettey K, et al. Incidence rate and age of onset of first stroke from CT scan examinations in Cape Coast metropolis. Heliyon. 2021;7(2)
5. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update.: 324-4-5.
6. English C, Hillier SL, Lynch EA (2017). Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(6).
7. English CK, Hillier SL, Stiller KR, Warden-Flood A (2007). Circuit class therapy versus individual physiotherapy sessions during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(8):955-963.
8. Soto-Cámara R, González-Bernal JJ, González-Santos J, Aguilar-Parra JM, Trigueros R, López-Liria R. Age-Related Risk Factors at the First Stroke Event. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(7):2233.