Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 123
VALUE OF 256-SLICE CT IN CORONARY STENOSIS WITH HIGH CALCIUM SCORE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: study the value of 256-slice coronary CT angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis with high Agaston calcium scores. Subjects and methods: a cross-sectional descriptive study of the cases with 256-slice CT and DSA coronary angiography from Jan 2020 to Sep 2022. Results: 46 patients were included in the study with Agaston calcification score ≥ 400, with 29 male and 17 female. The mean age was 70.17±10.51 (41 to 93 years old), mainly age of over 60 with 78.26%, the mean age of men was lower than that of women (p<0.05). At the patient level, the value of 256 slice CT in the diagnosis of coronary stenosis ≥50% has a Se: 97.7%, Sn: 50%, PPV: 97.7%, NPV: 50%, Acc: 97.7%. The diagnostic agreement of 256 slice CT and DSA was good on branches as LAD and LCx with calcification ≤400 (kappa: 0.62 and 0.85). Diagnostic agreement was moderate for remaining branches (kappa: 0.5 to 0.62). The value of diagnostic significant stenosis of 256-slice CT compared with DSA on arterial segment has an accuracy ranging from 71.7% to 97.5%. Conclusion: The value of 256 slice CT in significant coronary stenosis is reliable for cases with high calcium scores.
Article Details
Keywords
coronary stenosis, coronary calcium, 256-sequence CT.
References
2. Yamamoto M, Okura Y, Ishihara M. Development of Digital Subtraction Angiography for Coronary Artery. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2009;22(3):pp 319.
3. Chua SK, Hung HF, Cheng JJ, et al. Diagnostic Performance of 64- versus 256-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography Compared with Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. Zhonghua Minguo Xin Zang Xue Hui Za Zhi. 2013;29(2):151-159.
4. van Dijk JD, Shams MS, Ottervanger JP, Mouden M, van Dalen JA, Jager PL. Coronary artery calcification detection with invasive coronary angiography in comparison with unenhanced computed tomography. Coronary Artery Disease. 2017;28(3):pp 246-252.
5. Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2014;8(5):pp 342-358.
6. Javadrashid R, Salehi A, Tarzamni MK, Aslanabadi N, Pak N. Diagnostic efficacy of coronary calcium score in the assessment of significant coronary artery stenosis. Kardiologia Polska.:7.
7. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(12):2739-2747.
8. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, de Feyter PJ. Impact of Coronary Calcium Score on Diagnostic Accuracy for the detection of Significant Coronary Stenosis With Multislice Computed Tomography Angiography. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2005;95(10):pp 1225-1227.