Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 17/03/2023
Abstract Views: 182
Views PDF: 130
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v524i1A.4622
Issue
Vol. 524 No. 1A (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Đỗ, T. ., Vũ, C. N. ., & Nguyễn, Đình N. . (2023). AFFECTING FACTORS FOR REFRACRTIVE RESULTS AFTER PHACO-IOL-GSL USING THE BARRETT UNIVERSAL II FORMULA. Vietnam Medical Journal, 524(1A). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v524i1A.4622

AFFECTING FACTORS FOR REFRACRTIVE RESULTS AFTER PHACO-IOL-GSL USING THE BARRETT UNIVERSAL II FORMULA

Tấn Đỗ1,, Cao Ngọc Vũ2, Đình Ngân Nguyễn3
1 National Institute of Ophthalmology
2 354 hospital
3 Vietnam Military Medical Academy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives:To evaluate on some factors affecting refractive results after Phaco/IOL-GSL surgery úing the Barrett Universal II formula. Patients and methods: a prospective interventional study without control group on 45 eyes with primary angle-closure Glaucoma with cataract underwent surgery Phaco/IOL-GSL using Barrett Universal II formula. Results: There are 40/45 eyes in the study group with refractive error within ± 1D, the application of Barrett Universal II formula gives realatively good refractive results with Median absolute refractive error after surgery of 0,46 ± 0,54D. We have not found any statistiacally significant relationship between preoperative factors such as intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness with postoperative refractive outcome. Lens thickness had a trend to significant effect with p=0.067. Conclusion: There were no significant relationship between the preoperative factors with postoperative refractive outcome in this study.

Article Details

Keywords

Phacoemulsification intraocular lens implantation with goniosynechialysis (Phaco-GSL), PACG and cataract, The Barrett Universal II formula

References

1. Do, T., Efficacy of Phacoemulsification Alone vs Phacoemulsification With Goniosynechialysis in Patients With Primary Angle-Closure Disease A Randomized Clinical Tria. JAMAOphthalmology, 2019. 137(10):1107-1113.(10): p. 1107-1113.
2. Chungkwon, Tae-Eun Lee, Refactive Outcomes in Patiens with Primary Angle - Closure Glaucoma. 2022.
3. Jack X. Kane, Anton Van Heerden, Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016. 42: p. 1490-1500.
4. Zain Irfan Khatib, Suhas S Haldipurkar, Vijay Shetty, Harsha Dahake, Comparison of three newer generation freely available intraocular lens power calculation formulae across all axial lengths. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021. 69(3): p. 580-4.
5. Li Nie, Weihua Pan, Aiwu Fang, Zhangliang Li, Zhenbin Qian, Lin Fu, Yau Kei Chan. Combined phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis with or without endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of PACG with cataract. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018. 2018: p. 8160184.
6. Anju Rastogi, Kirti Jaisingh, Priyadarshini Suresh, Kamlesh Anand, Siddharth Baindur, Comparative Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Children. Ofthamology, 2022. 14(5): p. e24991.
7. Alexander C Day, David Cooper, Jennifer Burr, Paul J Foster, David S Friedman, Clear lens extraction for the management of primary angle closure glaucoma: surgical technique and refractive outcomes in the EAGLE cohort. Ophthalmology, 2018. 0: p. 1–5.
8. Sung Yong Kang, S.H., Jung Bin Won, Inaccuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction for Cataract Surgery in Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Yonsei Med J 2009. 50(2): p. 206-210.
9. Rajvi Mehta, Shizuka Tomatzu, Dingcai Cao. Refractive Outcomes for Combined Phacoemulsification and Glaucoma Drainage Procedure. Ophthalmol Ther, 2022. 11(1): p. 311-320.
10. Sam Seo PhD, Chong Eun Lee MD, Young Kook Kim MD, Factors affecting refractive outcome after cataract surgery in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2016. 44: p. 693-700.