LAPAROSCOPIC TOTALLY EXTRA-PERITONEAL SURGERY WITH TOTAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: INITIAL EXPERIENCE AT E HOSPITAL

Đình Liên Nguyễn1,2,, Văn Lực Ma 2, Minh Hùng Tô 3
1 VNU Hanoi-University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 E hospital
3 Lao Cai general hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of early results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer at E Hospital from june 2021 to june 2022. Patients and Methods: - Research Methods: Descriptive study of a case series. - Research subjects: 10 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent laparoscopic extraperitoneal resection of the entire prostate.- Research objectives include: age, prostate weight, total PSA before and after surgery, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Urinary function 3 months after surgery. Results: Average age is 63.4±3.9 years old (57-67 years old); Average prostate weight 43±9 g (28-60g) according to ultrasound, 38±8 g (25-52g) according to MRI; mean total PSA concentration before surgery 55.21 ng/mL (14.14-217.6 ng/mL); mean total PSA concentration 1-3 days after surgery 22.71 ng/mL (1.04 - 144.5 ng/mL); average operation time 317±65minutes (210-420 minutes); average blood loss 126ml; hospital stay after surgery 18 days (7-42 days); no complications during surgery; 01 case of peritoneal perforation was converted to transperitoneal total prostatectomy, 03/10 cases had postoperative anastomosis, all were treated endoscopically with minimally good results; 01 case with lymph node metastasis received adjuvant chemotherapy; 100% of cases have good urinary function 3 months after surgery. Conclusions: The method of laparoscopic extraperitoneal resection of the entire prostate due to localized prostate cancer is a safe and effective treatment method. Bladder-urethral junction fistula after total prostatectomy is a complication that can be encountered, but can be managed by endoscopic - ureteral catheterization.

Article Details

References

1. Đỗ Trường Thành, Trương Hoàng Minh, Trần Thanh Phong, Đỗ anh Đức, Nguyễn Văn Trí Dũng (2017). Đánh giá kết quả cắt toàn bộ tuyến tiền liệt triệt căn trong điều trị ung thư tuyến tiền liệt khu trú. Tạp chí Y Dược học, Số đặc biệt 8/2017: 129 - 132.
2. Trần Chí Thanh, Thiều Sỹ Sắc, Võ Văn Minh, Lê Hữu Thanh (2021). Phẫu thuật nội soi ổ bụng ngoài phúc mạc cắt toàn bộ tuyến tiền liệt do adenocarcinoma khu trú: Kinh nghiệm ban đầu qua 5 trường hợp. Kỷ yếu Hội thận học tiết niệu Việt Nam 2021. 142-148
3. Vũ Lê Chuyên, Vũ Văn Ty, Nguyễn Tuấn Vinh và cộng sự (2006). Phẫu thuật triệt để ung thư tiền liệt tuyến qua nội soi ổ bụng kinh nghiệm bước đầu qua 23 trường hợp. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, số 4, tập 10/2006.
4. Culp, M.B., et al. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol, 2020. 77: 38.
5. Elmor TR, Rubinstein M, Lima G, Cruz AC, Pereira CF, Rubinstein I. Minimally invasive treatment of vesicourethral leak after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016;43(3):185-188.
6. Karim Toujier, Fernado P. Scin, Angel M Cronin (2009). Oncology outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years experience. Eur Urol, May, 55(5): 1014 - 1019.
7. Kun Wang, Quianfeng Zhuang, Rengfang Xu and al. (2018). Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a meta analysis. Medecine, 97, Vol 29: 1-7
8. Mark William Louie Johnsun, Marcus M. Handmer, Ross John Spero Calopeds (2016). The Auatralian laparoscopic non robotic radical prostatectomy experience - analysis of 2943 cases (USANZ supplement). BJU Int, 118, Supplement 3: 43 - 48.