Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 12/04/2023
Abstract Views: 142
Views PDF: 95
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v525i1A.5008
Issue
Vol. 525 No. 1A (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Trần , T. T., & Phan , T. D. . (2023). SOME FACTORS AFFECT THE RESULTS OF PANOPTIX INTRAOCULAR LENS SURGERY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 525(1A). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v525i1A.5008

SOME FACTORS AFFECT THE RESULTS OF PANOPTIX INTRAOCULAR LENS SURGERY

Tất Thắng Trần 1,, Trọng Dũng Phan 2
1 Nghe An eye hospital
2 Nghe An eye hopsital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluation of some factors affecting the results of panoptix intraocular lens surgery. Subjects and methods: Prospective corelation study, Thirty-five eyes of the patient had only indications for Phaco surgery to place Pannoptix Intraocular lens and agreed to participate in the study, at Nghe An Eye Hospital from July 2021 to July 2022. Results: The age factor of patients is related to uncorrected distance vision, after maximal correction, affects contrast sensitivity with p < 0.05, but does not affect intermediate and visual acuity. force is close to p > 0.05. At 3 months after surgery, postoperative corneal astigmatism had an effect on uncorrected distal vision, intermediate visual acuity and uncorrected near vision at a statistically significant level with p < 0, 05 and did not affect far vision and near vision after maximal correction with p > 0.05, there was no relationship between residual spherical refraction after surgery to the results of uncorrected distal vision, visual acuity. Intermediate force and near vision after maximal correction after surgery with p > 0.05. The position of the artificial lens has an effect on the phenomenon of halo and glare after surgery at a statistically significant level with p < 0.05 but does not affect the contrast sensitivity and visual acuity results with p > 0.05.

Article Details

Keywords

Trifocal, Panoptix, Intraocular Lens, Refractive residuals

References

1. Carson D, Hill WE, Hong X et al (2014). Optical bench performance of AcrySof IQ ReSTOR, AT LISA tri, and Fine Vision intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol, 14, 8, 2105-13.
2. 47Park CY, Chuck RS (2011). Residual refractive error and visual outcome after cataract surgery using spherical versus Aspheric IOLs. Ophthalmic Surg Laser Imaging, 42(1), 37-43.
3. 48Jacobi PC, Konen W (1995). Effect of age and astigmatism on the AMO Array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg, 21(5), 556-61.
4. Levitz L, Reich J, Roberts K et al (2015). Evaluation of Toric Intraocular Lenses in Patients With Low Degrees of Astigmatism. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila), 4(5), 245-9.
5. Gangwani V, Hirnschall N, Findl O et al (2014). Multifocal toric intraocular lenses versus multifocal intraocular lenses combined with peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to correct moderate astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg, 40(10), 1625-32.
6. Kretz FT, Bastelica A, Carreras H et al (2015). Clinical outcomes and surgeon assessment after implantation of a new diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol, 99(3), 405-11.
7. Musanovic Z, Jusufovic V, Halibasica M et al (2012). Corneal astigmatism after micro-incision cataract operation. Med Arh, 66(2), 125-8.
8. Wang J, Zhang EK, Fan WY et al (2009). The effect of micro-incision and small-incision coaxial phaco-emulsification on corneal astigmatism. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 37(7), 664-9.
9. De Vries NE, Webers CA, Touwslager WR et al (2011). Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses, JCataract Refract Surg, 37(5), 859-65.
10. Hayashi K, Manabe S, Yoshida M et al (2010). Effect of astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. JCataract Refract Surg, 36(8), 1323-9.