Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 12/04/2023
Abstract Views: 166
Views PDF: 95
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v525i1A.5009
Issue
Vol. 525 No. 1A (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, Q. B. ., & Lò , Q. A. . (2023). THE CLINICAL AND SUBCLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS UNDERWENT INFERTILITY TREATMENT WITH HYSTEROSCOPY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 525(1A). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v525i1A.5009

THE CLINICAL AND SUBCLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS UNDERWENT INFERTILITY TREATMENT WITH HYSTEROSCOPY

Quảng Bắc Nguyễn1,, Quốc Anh Lò 2
1 National hospital of obstetrics and gynecology
2 Thương Xuan hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Describe the clinical and subclinical characteristics of patients underwent fertility treatment with hysteroscopy. Methodology: Retrospective Descriptive study. Results: While all patients had normal uterine size, 99,6% of them had normal uterine density. Normal uterine flexibility was also seen in all cases. The number of patients who had anteverted uterus were 113, and that accounts for 43,1%. The figures for patients who had retroverted uterus were 111 and 42,4% respectively. 210 patients had normal uterine cavity, and 36 patients had uterine synechiae. The number of patients who had filling defect in hysterosalpingoram was 11. In ultrasonography, although 98,9% of all cases had normal uterine cavity, the percentage for endometrial polype was 1,1%. Conclusion: The clinical and subclinical characteristics of infertile patients who had indication of hysteroscopy was atypical. Hysterosalpingogram and ultrasonography is diagnostically beneficial.

Article Details

Keywords

infertility, Uterine cavity, Uterine

References

1. Viện bảo vệ Bà mẹ và trẻ sơ sinh, Chẩn đoán và điều trị vô sinh, Nhà xuất bản Y học, 2003.
2. Đặng Thị Minh Nguyệt. Soi BTC để chẩn đoán các bất thường trong buồng tử cung, Luận án tiến sỹ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, 2006.
3. Wamsteker Kees, Emnuel. Mart H. "Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding", Ob & Gyn, Part 1, pp. 736 - 740. 1993.
4. Anastasiadis P.G, Koutlaki N.G, Skaphida P.G, Galazios G.C, Tsikouras P.N, Liberis V.A. “Endometrial polyps: prevalence, detection, and malignant potential in women with abnormal uterine bleeding”, Eur J Gynecol Oncol, 21, pp. 180 - 3. 2000.
5. Preutthipan S, Linasmita V. A prospective comparative study between hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the detection of intrauterine pathology in patients with infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2003; 29:33–37.
6. Golan A, Eilat E, Ron-El R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Bukovsky I. Hysteroscopy is superior to hysterosalpingography in infertility investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:654–656.
7. Fayez JA, Mutie G, Schneider PJ. The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in infertility investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:558–560