A STUDY ON HYSTEROSCOPY AMONG INFERTILE PATIENTS IN NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the results of hysteroscopy in patients treated for infertility. Methods: This is a retrospective study among infertile 225 patients who indicated for hysteroscopy. Results: Normal uterine cavity accounted for 64.5%, uterine adhesions and polyps 18.3% and 9.2%, respectively. Interventions that can be performed during hysteroscopy include Removal of uterine adhesions in 18.3% and 22% of cases of polypectomy. Mucosal biopsy and curettage 5.8%. Separation removal was 1.1% and fibroid removal was 0.4%. This study recorded a low complication rate. There was 1 case of uterine perforation, accounting for 0.4%. Conclusion: Hysteroscopy is a technique with high diagnostic accuracy and can be combined with one-stage intervention with low complication rate.
Article Details
Keywords
Infertility, hysteroscopy, X-ray of the uterus and fallopian tubes, ultrasound of the uterus, uterus cavity
References
2. Wamsteker Kees, Emnuel, Mart H. "Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding", Ob & Gyn, Part 1, p. 736 - 740. 1993.
3. Surrey.Mark W, Aronberg, Sandra. "Hysteroscopy in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding", Hysteroscopy principles and practice, JB Lippcotte, Philadelphia, p. 119 - 140. 1992.
4. Đặng Thị Minh Nguyệt. Soi BTC để chẩn đoán các bất thường trong buồng BTC [ Luận án tiến sỹ y học]: Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2006.
5. Fedor Kow D. "Is diagnostic hysteroscopy adhesiogenic?", BA - 41 Inter J. Fertil, (36), 1, p. 21 - 22. 1991.
6. Christian Deutschmann and al. "Hysteroscopic findings in postmenopausal bleeding", Hysteroscopy principles and practice , JB Lippincotte, Philadelphia. p. 132-134. 1992.
7. Bensimhon. E. Hystéroscopie et Microhystéroscopie, Thèse pour le doctorat en Médecine, Faculté de médecine Cochin- Port Royal. 1980.
8. Brooks, Philip G. "Complication of operative hysteroscopy. How safe is it ?", Clinical Obs & Gyn, (35), 2, p. 256 – 261. 1992.