VALUE OF CT SIGNS IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICYTIS

Đình Minh Nguyễn1,, Thu Huyền Phạm 2
1 Viet Duc hospital
2 Hanoi medical university

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: study the value of CT signs in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Subjects and methods: A comparing cross-sectional descriptive study of 55 patients with clinically suspected appendicitis, of which 25 patients were confirmed appendicitis after surgery, underwent abdominal CT scan at Viet-Duc Hospital from April to October 2022. Results: 16 men and 39 women, mean age was 41.75 ± 21.30 years old (from 5 to 93). The CT characteristics of acute appendicitis included enlarged appendix diameter >6mm (Se: 100%, NPP: 100%, Acc: 80% with OR: 3.2%; p<0.01), appendiceal wall thickening ≥ 3mm (Se: 84%, NPV: 85.2%, Acc: 80% and OR: 17.2; p<0.01), appendiceal intraluminal fluid (Se: 80%, NPV: 77.3% and OR: 5.2%; p<0.01), appendiceal fecal stones (Sp: 90%, PPV: 80% and OR: 8.3%; p<0.01), appendiceal intraluminal air is a negative sign (Sp: 83.3%, NPV: 80.6%, Acc: 80% and OR: 0.06; p<0.01). Peri-appendiceal abnormal CT signs including fat stranding (Se: 88%, Sp: 80%, Acc: 83.6% and OR: 29.3; p<0.01), strongly enhanced peri-appendiceal peritoneum (Se: 92%, Sp: 86.7%, Acc: 89.1% and OR: 74.7; p<0.01). The value of CT scans in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis had Se: 96%, Sp: 86.7%, Acc: 92.7%. Conclusion: The CT signs are specific and reliable in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Article Details

References

1. Sugiura K, Suzuki K, Umeyama T, Omagari K, Hashimoto T, Tamura A. Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial nonoperative management versus emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis. BMC Health Serv Res. Nov 9 2020;20(1):1019. doi:10.1186/ s12913-020-05839-6
2. Hardin DM, Jr. Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician. Nov 1 1999; 60(7):2027-34.
3. Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R, Pinto P, Sirlin C. CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 2005; 185(2):406-17. doi:10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850406
4. Karul M, Berliner C, Keller S, Tsui TY, Yamamura J. Imaging of appendicitis in adults. Rofo. Jun 2014;186(6):551-8. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1366074
5. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. Apr 15 2020;15(1):27. doi:10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3
6. Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, et al. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol. Nov 2003;44(6):574-82. doi:10.1080/02841850312331287819
7. Doãn Văn Ngọc, Đào Danh Vĩnh, Lê Văn Khảng. Nghiên cứu giá trị của chụp Cắt lớp vi tính trong chẩn đoán viêm ruột thừa cấp. Tạp chí Điện quang và Y học hạt nhân Việt Nam. 07/11 2022;(10):370-375. doi:10.55046/vjrnm.10.276.2012
8. Khan MS, Chaudhry MBH, Shahzad N, Tariq M, Memon WA, Alvi AR. Risk of appendicitis in patients with incidentally discovered appendicoliths. Journal of Surgical Research. 2018/01/01/ 2018;221:84-87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.08.021
9. Hong HS, Cho HS, Woo JY, et al. Intra-Appendiceal Air at CT: Is It a Useful or a Confusing Sign for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis? Korean J Radiol. Jan-Feb 2016;17(1):39-46. doi:10.3348/kjr.2016.17.1.39