ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING CHOLEDOCHAL CYSTS IN CHILDREN

Thị Thanh Thảo Lê1,, Cao Cương Nguyễn2, Phương Thảo Nghiêm 2
1 Medic
2 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Description the imaging characteristics of choledochal cyst on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Determination the merits of MRI in diagnosing choledochal cysts in children. Methods: 43 patients were diagnosed choledochal cyst postoperative and had Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) from 1 January 2020 to 30 July 2022 in City Children’s Hospital. MRI results were compared with intraoperative findings. Methods: Retrospective series of cases. Results: In 43 patients choledochal cyst including 32 girls and 11 boys: Mean age of 54,5 ± 42,7 months (1 months – 14 years). Female/male=2,9/1. The most common clinical symptoms were abdominal pain 79,1% and vomiting 53,5%. Choledochal cyst on MRI: The type of choledochal cysts (according to Todani): only type I (79,1%) (20,9%) and type  IV. Type of dilatation: cystic dilatation (81,4%), fusiform dilatation (18,6%); Mean measurement: 34,8 ± 25,8mm; Stone in cyst (37,2%); intrahepatoc duct dilatation (39,5%). On MRI, there are 7 cases (16,3%) anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction (APBJ), 5 cases (11,6%) hepatic duct stenosis and 3 cases (7%) anatomic variants of the biliary tree. The sensitivity, specificity was 100%; 87,8% in diagnosing APBJ, 100%; 97,4% in diagnosing hepatic duct stenosis and 100%, 100% in diagnosing anatomic variants of the biliary tree. Conclusion: MRCP has a high value in detecting APBJ, diagnosing hepatic duct stenosis and anatomic variants of the biliary tree. Pre-operative MRI should be performed in all of pediatric choledochal cysts patients.

Article Details

References

1. Gonzales K.D LH. Choledochal cyst. Pediatric Surgery. 2012:983-988.
2. Moslim MA, Takahashi H, Seifarth FG, al. e. Choledochal Cyst Disease in a Western Center: A 30-Year Experience. J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 2016;20(8):1453-63. doi:10.1007/s11605-016-3181-4
3. Makin E, Davenport M. Understanding choledochal malformation. Arch Dis Child. Jan 2012;97(1):69-72. doi:10.1136/adc.2010.195974
4. Huỳnh Giới. Kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi cắt nang ống mật chủ ở trẻ em dựa trên chẩn đoán hình ảnh cộng hưởng từ mật-tụy. Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh; 2013.
5. Liem NT, Pham HD, Dung le A, Son TN, Vu HM. Early and intermediate outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for choledochal cysts with 400 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. Jul-Aug 2012;22(6):599-603. doi:10.1089/ lap.2012.0018
6. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Nga, Võ Tấn Đức, Nguyễn Thị Phương Loan. Đặc điểm hình ảnh nang ống mật chủ ở trẻ em trên siêu âm và cộng hưởng từ. Y học TP Hồ Chí Minh. 2019;23(1)
7. Lee HC, Yeung CY, Chang PY, Sheu JC, Wang NL. Dilatation of the biliary tree in children: sonographic diagnosis and its clinical significance. Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Mar 2000;19(3):177-82; quiz 183-4. doi:10.7863/jum.2000.19.3.177
8. Trương Nguyễn Uy Linh. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm bệnh lý nang ống mật chủ và đánh giá kết quả cắt nang triệt để ở trẻ em. Luận án Tiến sĩ y học. Đại học Y dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh; 2008.
9. Huang CT, Lee HC, Chen WT, Jiang CB, Shih SL, Yeung CY. Usefulness of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in pancreatobiliary abnormalities in pediatric patients. Pediatr Neonatol. Dec 2012;52(6):332-6. doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.08.006
10. Saito T. Use of preoperative, 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in pediatric choledochal cysts. Surgery. Apr 2011; 149(4):569-75. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.004