EVALUATING THE RESULT OF ENUCLEATION OF BENIGN PROSTATE HYPERPLASIA BY HOLMIUM-LASER AT VIET DUC FRIENDSHIP HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
- Purpose: In this study, we apply the technique of enucleation modified en block of benign prostate hyperplasia by Holmium laser and evaluate the early results of this surgery. 2. Materials and Methods: We evaluated on 258 patients with urinary disorders due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, undergoing surgery to remove hypertrophic benign prostate by Holmium laser from January 2020 to January 2022. The en bloc method enucleation modified was performed by 2 incisions at 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock. Perioperative we assessed the time of enucleation, the time of morcellation to take the specimens out. The amount of blood lost during surgery, bleeding complications. Postoperative parameters include: time of urethral catheterization, length of hospital stay. Functional outcomes: Qmax and IPSS at 3 month postoperative. Short term complications including clot retention (blood clot retention in the bladder), blood transfusion, urinary tract infection, recatheterisation, and incontinence. Clavien–Dindo classification complications, and continence status were assessed. Patients were assessed for follow-up after surgery for 3 month. 3. Results: The average age of the study group is 74,51. The average weight of prostate is 77,54g (30-230g). The average PSA is 8,23ng / ml. The mean preoperative IPSS is 25,27. The average operation time is 72,55 minutes, of which the time of enucleation is 50,76 minutes and the time of morcellation is 18,55 minutes. The average blood lost during surgery is 7,26g/l. During surgery, there were 8 patients with severe bleeding requiring blood transfusion. The average time of urethral catheterization is 4.55 days, the average length of hospital stay is 5.31 days. After surgery, 18 patients (6,97%) had urinary retention to have their recatherization and 32 patients had stress incontinence when changing their posture (12,40%). After 3 months, 229 (88,75%) patients urinated normally. There were no serious complications after surgery. 29 patients still had stress urinary incontinence (11,24%). The average postoperative IPSS is 5,14 ± 3.7. The postoperative weight of prostate determined by ultrasound is 22.50 ± 2,5g. 4. Conclusion: The procedure of enucleation of benign prostatic hyperplasia by two incisions at 6 and 12 o'clock with Holmium laser is safe and effective surgery for all sizes of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Article Details
Keywords
benign prostatic hyperplasia, holmium laser, HoLEP
References
1. Katsumi Shigemura and Masato Fujisawa, 2018, Current status of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, International Journal of Urology (2018) 25, 206—211.
2. Marien T, Kadihasanoglu M, Miller NL. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives. Res. Rep. Urol. 2016; 8: 181–92.
3. Kim M, Song SH, Ku JH, Kim HJ, Paick JS. Pilot study of the clinical efficacy of ejaculatory hood sparing technique for ejaculation preservation in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2015; 27: 20–4.
4. Kim SH, Yang HK, Lee HE, Paick JS, Oh SJ. HoLEP does not affect the overall sexual function of BPH patients: a prospective study. Asian J. Androl. 2014; 16: 873–7.
5. Seung-June Oh, Current surgical techniques of enucleation in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, Investig Clin Urol 2019;60:333-342.
6. Serdar Yalçın et al, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases, Turk J Urol 2020 10.5152/ tud.2020.19235.
7. Ilter Alkan 1, Hakan Ozveri 2, Yigit Akin 3, Tumay Ipekci 4, Yusuf Alican (2016), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: surgical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes upon extended follow-up, Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 42: 293-301.
8. Young Ju Lee1, Shin Ah Oh1 , Sung Han Kim2, Seung-June Oh (2017), Patient satisfaction after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): A prospective cohort study, https:// doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone. 0182230.
9. Agostino TUCCIO et al (2020), En-bloc endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review of the literature, Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 June;72(3):292-312
2. Marien T, Kadihasanoglu M, Miller NL. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives. Res. Rep. Urol. 2016; 8: 181–92.
3. Kim M, Song SH, Ku JH, Kim HJ, Paick JS. Pilot study of the clinical efficacy of ejaculatory hood sparing technique for ejaculation preservation in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2015; 27: 20–4.
4. Kim SH, Yang HK, Lee HE, Paick JS, Oh SJ. HoLEP does not affect the overall sexual function of BPH patients: a prospective study. Asian J. Androl. 2014; 16: 873–7.
5. Seung-June Oh, Current surgical techniques of enucleation in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, Investig Clin Urol 2019;60:333-342.
6. Serdar Yalçın et al, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of size-independent BPH: A single-center experience of 600 cases, Turk J Urol 2020 10.5152/ tud.2020.19235.
7. Ilter Alkan 1, Hakan Ozveri 2, Yigit Akin 3, Tumay Ipekci 4, Yusuf Alican (2016), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: surgical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes upon extended follow-up, Int Braz J Urol. 2016; 42: 293-301.
8. Young Ju Lee1, Shin Ah Oh1 , Sung Han Kim2, Seung-June Oh (2017), Patient satisfaction after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): A prospective cohort study, https:// doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone. 0182230.
9. Agostino TUCCIO et al (2020), En-bloc endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review of the literature, Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2020 June;72(3):292-312