Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 26/05/2023
Abstract Views: 288
Views PDF: 131
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v526i1B.5448
Issue
Vol. 526 No. 1B (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Lâm , T. Q. M. ., Trần, P. T. N. ., & Trần, X. V. . (2023). CYTOTOXICITY OF CALCIUM SILICATE - BASED ROOT CANAL SEALER ON HUMAN PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT STEM CELLS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 526(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v526i1B.5448

CYTOTOXICITY OF CALCIUM SILICATE - BASED ROOT CANAL SEALER ON HUMAN PERIODONTAL LIGAMENT STEM CELLS

Thị Quỳnh Mai Lâm 1, Phạm Thùy Nhung Trần2, Xuân Vĩnh Trần1,
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
2 National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, HCM city

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of calcium silicate root canal sealer (BioRoot RCS; Septodont, Saint Maur Des Fossés, France) and calcium silicate root canal sealer CeraSeal (Meta-Biomed, Korea). Methods: Human periodontal ligament stem cells were exposed to direct extraits of different concentrations of each material. The percentage of survival cell (%) was then determined using the MTT assay. Results: Safe concentrations (percentage of survival cell > 70%) of BioRootTM RCS is from 50% onwards, CeraSeal is safe at all concentrations. Conclusion: BioRootTM RCS and CeraSeal are two root canal sealers that have less cytotoxicity on human periodontal ligament stem cells.

Article Details

Keywords

cytotoxicity, calcium silicate- based root canal sealer, BioRootTM RCS, CeraSeal, human periodontal ligament stem cells

References

1. Park, E., Shen, Y. and Haapasalo, M. (2012), “Irrigation of the apical root canal”, Endod Topics, 27, pp 54-73.1.
2. Kaur A, Shah N, Logani A, Mishra N. (2015), “Biotoxicity of commonly used root canal sealers: A meta-analysis”, J Conserv Dent, 18(2), pp 83-88.
3. Lee BN, Hong JU, Kim SM, Jang JH, Chang HS, Hwang YC, Hwang IN, Oh WM. (2019), “Anti-inflammatory and Osteogenic Effects of Calcium Silicate-based Root Canal Sealers”, J Endod, 45(1), pp 73-78.
4. Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M.(2013), “Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers”, J Endod, 39(10), pp 1281-1286.
5. Al-Haddad A, Ab Aziz C, Zeti A. (2016), “Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: A review”, Int J Biomater.
6. El-Mansy L.H., Ali M.M., Hassan R.E.S. (2020), “Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of a Recent Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer (BioRoot™ RCS): In-vivo Study”, Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol 8, D, pp 100–106.
7. Josette Camilleri (2015), “Sealers and Warm Gutta-percha Obturation Techniques”, Journal of Endodontics, Vol 41(1), pp 72-78.
8. Maria Xuereb, Paul Vella, Denis Damidot, Charles V. Sammut, Josette Camilleri (2015), “In Situ Assessment of the Setting of Tricalcium Silicate–based Sealers Using a Dentin Pressure Model”, Journal of Endodontics,41(1), pp 111-124.
9. Gaudin A, Tolar M, Peters OA (2020), “Cytokine Production and Cytotoxicity of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers in 2- and 3-dimensional Cell Culture Models”, J Endod, 46(6), pp 818-826.
10. Eldeniz AU, Shehata M, Högg C, Reichl FX. (2016), “DNA double-strand breaks caused by new and contemporary endodontic sealers”, Int Endod J, 49(12), pp 1141-1151.