Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 26/05/2023
Abstract Views: 351
Views PDF: 202
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v526i1B.5463
Issue
Vol. 526 No. 1B (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, T. T. . (2023). COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF DUAL OOCYTE MATURATION REGIMEN AND OOCYTE MATURATION BY HCG ALONE ON NORMAL OVARIAN RESPONSE GROUP IN IN VITRO FERTILIZATION CYCLES USING ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 526(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v526i1B.5463

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF DUAL OOCYTE MATURATION REGIMEN AND OOCYTE MATURATION BY HCG ALONE ON NORMAL OVARIAN RESPONSE GROUP IN IN VITRO FERTILIZATION CYCLES USING ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL

Thanh Tùng Nguyễn1,
1 Vietnam Military Medical Academy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effect of oocyte maturation by HCG and Dual trigger in cycles of in vitro fertilization on ovarian follicles and blastocyst formation rate. Subjects and methods: Retrospective descriptive study on 104 cycles of in vitro fertilization at Military Institute of Clinical Embryology and Histology, Vietnam Military Medical University, using antagonist protocol including two groups of dual trigger and hCG trigger. Comparison of the criteria of age, BMI, AMH, endocrine tests, endometrial thickness on trigger day, MII rate, number of cleavage embryos and number of blastocyst in two groups. Results: Number of mature oocytes (6.98 ± 3.71 vs 4.76 ± 3.7, p=0.04), number of 2PN (6.03 ± 3.03 vs 4.98 ± 2.85, p=0.045), number of cleavage (4.58 ± 2.81 vs 3.78 ± 2.11, p=0.045the number of blastocyst (3.81 ± 2.49 vs 2.37 ± 1.72, p=0.0009) and the number of good blastocyst (3.43 ± 1.95 vs 2.18 ± 1.69, p=0.0007) were statistically significantly higher in dual trigger group. Conclusion: Using dual trigger protocol with normal responser showed an increase in the number of mature oocytes, number of 2PN, number of clavage, number of blastocyst, number of good blastocyst compared with hCG trigger group.

Article Details

Keywords

dual trigger; oocyte maturation, hCG

References

1. Humaidan, Ejdrup Bredkjær, Bungum. et al (2005) GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. 20 (5), 1213-1220.
2. Lin, Wu, Lee. et al (2013) Dual trigger with combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin significantly improves the live-birth rate for normal responders in GnRH-antagonist cycles. 100 (5), 1296-1302.
3. Ding, Liu, Jian. et al (2017) Dual trigger of final oocyte maturation with a combination of GnRH agonist and hCG versus a hCG alone trigger in GnRH antagonist cycle for in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 218, 92-98.
4. Dương (2021) So sánh kết quả trưởng thành noãn bằng hCG với hCG kết hợp GnRHa trên những trường hợp buồng trứng đáp ứng kém tại Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung Ương,
5. Griffin, Feinn, Engmann. et al (2014) Dual trigger with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and standard dose human chorionic gonadotropin to improve oocyte maturity rates. 102 (2), 405-409.
6. Haas, Zilberberg, Dar. et al (2014) Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation (double trigger) in patients with low number of oocytes retrieved per number of preovulatory follicles-a preliminary report. 7, 1-4.
7. Decleer, Osmanagaoglu, Seynhave. et al (2014) Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial. 6 (4), 203.
8. Haas, Bassil, Samara. et al (2020) GnRH agonist and hCG (dual trigger) versus hCG trigger for final follicular maturation: a double-blinded, randomized controlled study. 35 (7), 1648-1654.