THE RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RECTAL RESECTION DUE TO CARCINOMA AT THANH NHAN HOSPITAL

Quốc Ái Đặng 1,, Văn Biên Phạm 2,3
1 HMU
2 E hospital
3 Thanh Nhan hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Rectal cancer is a common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. The main treatment for rectal cancer is still radical surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiation. We carried out this study to evaluate the results of laparoscopic rectal resection for colorectal cancer at Thanh Nhan Hospital. Subjects and methods: This is a retrospective study of 94 rectal carcinoma patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection and lymph node dissection at Thanh Nhan hospital from January 2018 to June 2022. Results: The average surgical time was 200 ± 44.2 minutes. The rate of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery close to the base was 90.4%. The rate of ileostomy to protect the anastomosis was 27.7%. 97.9% of joints use connectors. The average number of dredged lymph nodes: 14 ± 8.95 nodes. Surgery has guaranteed oncology: 100% of immediate biopsies are negative, 100% of post-surgery section tests have no malignant cells. The postoperative hospital stay was 9.0 days, defecation after 3.0 days, oral nutrition after 4.5 days, abdominal drainage after 7.0 days. Complications: wound infection 3.2%, anastomosis fistula 1.1%, anastomosis bleeding 1.1%. There was no mortality in the postoperative period. Distant results after surgery monitored 79(84,0%) patients. There was 17 deaths accounted for 18.0%. Rate of recurrence, metastasis is 12.5%, no local recurrence. The mean survival time after surgery of the study group was 43.67 ± 2.15 months. The 1-year survival rate is 97.6%, the 3-year survival rate is 72.6%, the 5-year survival rate is 40.2%. Conclusion: Laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal carcinoma is a safe operation, with low rates of complications and complications, good postoperative recovery, and effective oncology.

Article Details

References

1. Kong, M., et al., Comparison of Survival Among Adults With Rectal Cancer Who Have Undergone Laparoscopic vs Open Surgery: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open, 2022. 5(5): p. e2210861.
2. Zhu, Y., et al., Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer. Sci Rep, 2021. 11(1): p. 9338.
3. Thien HH, Hiep PN, Thanh PH, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for locally advanced middle-low rectal cancers. BJS open. Apr 2020;4(2):268-273. doi:10.1002/bjs5.50234
4. Hida, K., et al., Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Large, Multicenter, Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study in Japan. Ann Surg, 2018. 268(2): p. 318-324.
5. Kim, G. and K.Y. Lee, Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and pathological outcomes. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2022. 17(3): p. 387-405.
6. Ryu, H.S. and J. Kim, Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2022. 103(1): p. 1-11.
7. Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. Metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III rectal carcinoma is a valuable prognostic factor even with less than 12 lymph nodes retrieved: a prospective study. American journal of surgery. Jun 2014;207(6):824-31. doi:10.1016/ j.amjsurg.2013.07.022
8. Weiser MR. AJCC 8th Edition: Colorectal Cancer. Annals of surgical oncology. Jun 2018;25(6):1454-1455. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6462-1
9. Teurneau-Hermansson K, Svensson Neufert R, Buchwald P, Jorgren F. Rectal washout does not increase the complication risk after anterior resection for rectal cancer. World journal of surgical oncology. Mar 19 2021;19(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12957-021-02193-7
10. Liu C, Li X, Wang Q. Postoperative complications observed with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis of recently published studies. Medicine. Sep 10 2021;100 (36):e27158. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000027158