THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SEVERAL PSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS AND THE OUTCOMES OF N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE RECEPTOR ENCEPHALITIS TREATMENT

Hồng Khôi Võ 1,2,3,, Văn Toàn Phan 2, Thế Nhân Võ 1,3
1 Bach Mai hospital
2 HMU
3 VNU Hanoi-University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between several psychiatric symptoms and the outcomes of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDAR encephalitis) treatment. Subjects: 40 patients diagnosed and treated for anti-NMDAR encephalitis between 01/2020 and 10/2022 at the Neurology Center of Bach Mai Hospital. Methods: Cross-sectional analytical study. Patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 2 at discharge were classified as good treatment outcome, and patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of > 2 at discharge were classified as poor treatment outcome. Then, we evaluated the relationship between psychiatric symptoms and the treatment outcomes. Results: Among the 40 study patients, the mean age was 33.68 ± 13.81, with a predominant female proportion (65%). The most common symptoms were cognitive decline (75%), followed by inappropriate thinking and bizarre behavior, language progression decline, and delusions at rates of 57.5%, 57.5%, and 52.5%, respectively. The treatment outcome showed 17 patients (42.5%) achieved good results, while 23 patients (57.5%) had poor outcome. The analysis revealed that patients with inappropriate thinking and bizarre behavior symptoms had a 5.194-fold higher risk of poor outcomes than those without these symptoms (p <0.05). Conclusion: In summary, our study revealed that anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients with inappropriate thinking and bizarre behavior symptoms had a 5.194-fold higher risk of poor outcomes than those without these symptoms (95% CI 1.33 - 20.284, p <0.05).

Article Details

References

1. Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis. N Engl J Med. Mar 1 2018; 378(9):840-851. doi:10.1056/ NEJMra1708712
2. Dalmau J, Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, et al. Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The Lancet Neurology. 2011;10(1): 63-74. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70253-2
3. Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, et al. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. The Lancet Neurology. 2008;7(12):1091-1098. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70224-2
4. Florance NR, Davis RL, Lam C, et al. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents. Ann Neurol. Jul 2009;66(1):11-18. doi:10.1002/ ana.21756
5. Warren N, Siskind D, O'Gorman C. Refining the psychiatric syndrome of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. Nov 2018;138(5):401-408. doi:10.1111/ acps.12941
6. Sarkis RA, Coffey MJ, Cooper JJ, et al. Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis: A Review of Psychiatric Phenotypes and Management Considerations: A Report of the American Neuropsychiatric Association Committee on Research. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. Spring 2019;31(2):137-142. doi: 10.1176/ appi.neuropsych.18010005
7. Mo Y, Wang L, Zhu L, et al. Analysis of Risk Factors for a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis and Construction of a Prognostic Composite Score. J Clin Neurol. Jul 2020;16(3):438-447. doi:10.3988/jcn.2020.16.3.438