Article Sidebar
Views PDF: 153
WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN VIETNAM
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To estimate willingness to pay for Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in Vietnam. Method: Employing contigent valuation method with double-bounded question design to estimate willingness to pay for FOBT and colonoscopy. We surveyed 402 patients aged 50-75 years old who goes to the outpatient clinics of Hoan Kiem District Medical Center from January to March 2019. Results and conclusion: 7.2% of study participants refused to pay out-of-pocket to perform colorectal cancer screening using either the FOBT or colonoscopy. Mean and median willingness-to-pay values for the FOBT were 459,650 VND (95% CI: 402,410; 548,660) and 335,220 VND (95% CI: 303,810; 372,280). Similarly, the mean and median willingness to pay values for colonoscopy were VND 752,300 (95% CI: 690,050; 831,750) and VND 582,000 (95% CI: 537,600; 627,300).
Article Details
Keywords
Willingness to pay, stated preference, contigent valuation, WTP, CV
References
2. Breidert, C., M. Hahsler, and T. Reutterer, A review of methods for measuring willingness-to-pay. Innovative Marketing, 2006. 2(4): p. 8-32.
3. Hollinghurst, S., et al., Using willingness-to-pay to establish patient preferences for cancer testing in primary care. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. 16(1): p. 1-13.
4. Mitchell, R.C., R.T. Carson, and R.T. Carson, Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. 1989: Resources for the Future.
5. Yoo, S.-H., S.-J. Kwak, and T.-Y. Kim, Modelling willingness to pay responses from dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys with zero observations. Applied Economics, 2001. 33(4): p. 523-529.
6. Saengow, U., et al., Willingness to pay for colorectal cancer screening and effect of copayment in Southern Thailand. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP, 2018. 19(6): p. 1727.
7. Lin, P.-J., et al., Willingness to pay for diagnostic technologies: a review of the contingent valuation literature. Value In Health, 2013. 16(5): p. 797-805.