Article Sidebar
Date Published:
09/09/2023
Abstract Views: 100
Views pdf: 129
Views pdf: 129
Issue
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Đào, T. H. N., Võ , M. T., & Nguyễn, T. H. (2023). EVALUATION THE RESTORATION EFFECT FOR PRIMARY MOLARS USING GIC . Vietnam Medical Journal, 529(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v529i2.6495
EVALUATION THE RESTORATION EFFECT FOR PRIMARY MOLARS USING GIC
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To eValuate the efficiency of primary molar’s restoration using GIC Fuji Bulk and Fuji Extra in 4-8 year-old children. Results: After 6 months: the retention, the well-joined of restoration in Fuji Bulk group were 100% Và 93,2% of the cases while in Fuji IX Extra group were 98,6% Và 89,2% of the cases; code D0 result was 77,0% and 60,8% in Fuji Bulk and Fuji IX Extra in turn. Conclusion: The success rate in Fuji Bulk group was higher than Fuji IX Extra group, that difference was significant.
Article Details
Keywords
Teeth, caries, Fuji Bulk, Fuji IX Extra
References
1. Trịnh Đình Hải, Nguyễn Thị Hồng Minh, Trần Cao Bính (2019). Điều tra sức khỏe răng miệng toàn quốc 2019. Nhà xuất bản y học.
2. Võ Trương Như Ngọc (2015). Răng trẻ em dành cho học viên sau đại học. Nhà xuất bản đại học Huế, 331-332, 803-817.
3. Shiu-yin Cho, Ansgar C. Cheng (1999). A ReView of Glass Ionomer Restorations in the Primary Dentition. J Can Dent Assoc, 65:491-5.
4. Nguyễn Văn Tuấn (2008). Y học Thực chứng, Nhà xuất bản Y học Tp.HCM, 221-231
5. Kyou-Li Kim, Cheol Namgung, Byeong-Hoon Cho (2013). The effect of clinical performance on the surViVal estimates of direct restorations. RestoratiVe Dentistry and Endodontics, 38(1), 11-20.
6. Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ (2000). Clinical
eValuation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Pediatric Dent 2000 NoV-Dec, 22(6):486-8.
7. Manal A. El Sayed (2019). “Evaluation of clinical performance and success of Fuji II and Fuji IX in restoring occlusal caries of primary molars oVer a one year follow up: A Randomized Clinical Trial”. Egyptian Dental Journal, Vol 65, 1:11
8. Maha H. Daou (2008). “Clinical evaluation of four different dental restoratiVe materials: one- year results”. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 118: 290–295.
9. Araya Phonghanyudh (2014). “Clinical eValuation of class II high-Viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result”. M Dent J, 34(2)
10. Yilmaz Y1, Eyuboglu O, Kocogullari ME et al (2006). A one-year clinical eValuation of a high- Viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars. J Contemp Dent Pract, 7(1):71-8.
2. Võ Trương Như Ngọc (2015). Răng trẻ em dành cho học viên sau đại học. Nhà xuất bản đại học Huế, 331-332, 803-817.
3. Shiu-yin Cho, Ansgar C. Cheng (1999). A ReView of Glass Ionomer Restorations in the Primary Dentition. J Can Dent Assoc, 65:491-5.
4. Nguyễn Văn Tuấn (2008). Y học Thực chứng, Nhà xuất bản Y học Tp.HCM, 221-231
5. Kyou-Li Kim, Cheol Namgung, Byeong-Hoon Cho (2013). The effect of clinical performance on the surViVal estimates of direct restorations. RestoratiVe Dentistry and Endodontics, 38(1), 11-20.
6. Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ (2000). Clinical
eValuation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Pediatric Dent 2000 NoV-Dec, 22(6):486-8.
7. Manal A. El Sayed (2019). “Evaluation of clinical performance and success of Fuji II and Fuji IX in restoring occlusal caries of primary molars oVer a one year follow up: A Randomized Clinical Trial”. Egyptian Dental Journal, Vol 65, 1:11
8. Maha H. Daou (2008). “Clinical evaluation of four different dental restoratiVe materials: one- year results”. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 118: 290–295.
9. Araya Phonghanyudh (2014). “Clinical eValuation of class II high-Viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result”. M Dent J, 34(2)
10. Yilmaz Y1, Eyuboglu O, Kocogullari ME et al (2006). A one-year clinical eValuation of a high- Viscosity glass ionomer cement in primary molars. J Contemp Dent Pract, 7(1):71-8.