Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 24/11/2023
Abstract Views: 302
Views pdf: 256
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v532i1.7317
Issue
Vol. 532 No. 1 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, T. H. H., Trần, N. T., Nguyễn, H. G., Nguyễn, T. T., Nguyễn, T. T. N., Phạm, H. H., Bùi, K. L., Đỗ, T. Q., Nguyễn, T. H., & Hồ, H. T. P. (2023). EFFECTIVENESS OF DATA VISUALIZATION ON WEARABLE SENSOR DEVICES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY EXPLORING EXPERIENCES OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 532(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v532i1.7317

EFFECTIVENESS OF DATA VISUALIZATION ON WEARABLE SENSOR DEVICES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY EXPLORING EXPERIENCES OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

Thị Hoa Huyền Nguyễn1,, Ngọc Trân Trần1, Hương Giang Nguyễn1, Trường Tùng Nguyễn1, Thị Thuý Ngần Nguyễn1, Huy Hiệu Phạm1, Khánh Linh Bùi1,2, Thu Quyên Đỗ1,2, Thị Hường Nguyễn3, Hoàng Thu Phương Hồ4
1 VinUniversity
2 HMU
3 Hanoi College of High Technology
4 Vinmec Times City International Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Assess Insight Hub dashboard’s effectiveness in visualizing data from Fitbit Charge 5 wearables to support healthcare workers regarding patient care and treatment. Materials and Methods: A qualitative study design with a purposive sampling approach was employed, using a structured, in-depth interview method to involve 15 healthcare workers. Results: Advantages of the Insight Hub included its user-friendly interface, data aggregation capabilities, and individual customization options. Healthcare professionals can effectively monitor patients' conditions and identify gaps in care. However, the Insight Hub had limitations regarding data loss, display, and connectivity issues. Conclusion: Insight Hub facilitates healthcare workers’ decision-making, optimizes workflow, and enhances communication. Further development of the Insight Hub and additional research are necessary to promote adoption in healthcare settings.

Article Details

Keywords

data visualization, smart wearable sensors, healthcare providers, decision-making.

References

Hajat, C. and E. Stein, The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review. Prev Med Rep, 2018. 12: p. 284-293.
2. Chandrasekaran, R., V. Katthula, and E. Moustakas, Patterns of Use and Key Predictors for the Use of Wearable Health Care Devices by US Adults: Insights from a National Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2020. 22 (10): p. e22443.
3. Uddin, M. and S. Syed-Abdul, Data Analytics and Applications of the Wearable Sensors in Healthcare: An Overview. Sensors, 2020. 20(5): p. 1379.
4. Roberts-Lewis, S.F., et al., Validity of Fitbit activity monitoring for adults with progressive muscle diseases. Disabil Rehabil, 2022. 44(24): p. 7543-7553.
5. Selvaraj, S. and S. Sundaravaradhan, Challenges and opportunities in IoT healthcare systems: a systematic review. SN Applied Sciences, 2020. 2(1): p. 139.
6. Jones, S.S., et al., Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern Med, 2014. 160(1): p. 48-54.
7. Jamshidi, E., et al., How to utilize tacit knowledge in health organizations: An Iranian perspective. Med J Islam Repub Iran, 2018. 32: p. 116.
8. Jawhari, B., et al., Barriers and facilitators to Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use in an urban slum. Int J Med Inform, 2016. 94: p. 246-54.
9. Clarke, S., M.L. Wilson, and M. Terhaar, Using Dashboard Technology and Clinical Decision Support Systems to Improve Heart Team Efficiency and Accuracy: Review of the Literature. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2016. 225: p. 364-6.