Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 07/12/2023
Abstract Views: 76
Views PDF: 57
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v532i1B.7500
Issue
Vol. 532 No. 1B (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Vũ, T. T. H., Trần, Q. A., Lê, N. T., & Đặng, C. S. (2023). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TREATMENT REULTS AMENOBLASTOMA USING RADICAL SURGICAL METHOD. Vietnam Medical Journal, 532(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v532i1B.7500

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TREATMENT REULTS AMENOBLASTOMA USING RADICAL SURGICAL METHOD

Thị Thanh Hằng Vũ1,, Quỳnh Anh Trần1, Ngọc Tuyến Lê2, Công Sơn Đặng3
1 HMU
2 Central Dental Hospital
3 Institute of Science, Technology and Public Health

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: 1.To review the results of radical surgecy method for ameloblastoma. Subjects and methods: a systematic review of treatment results for amoloblastoma by radical surgecy. The number found with 2 databases Pubmed, Cochrane was 186. After excluding duplicate cases 184 documents were reviewed for titles and abstracts. In this step, 128 non-conforming documents were removed, leaving 56 documents included in the full-text analysis. After analyzing the full-text articles, 10 documents were included in the study. Results: of 10 studies included in the analysis, 8 were included in the meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of radical surgical treatment in patients with NSCLC. Radical surgery is 6.16 times more effective than other methods. The rate of successful treatment after radical surgery was recorded at a high level (78.6-100%), during the mean follow-up period of less than 10 years. Conclusion: The radical surgery method has good effect for patients with ameloblastoma, helping to reduce the possibility of recurrence and reduce the rate of new interventions on patients.

Article Details

Keywords

Surgery, ameloblastoma

References

1. Rifkin WJ, Kantar RS, Ali-Khan S, et al. Facial Disfigurement and Identity: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Facial Transplantation. AMA J Ethics. 2018;20(4):309-323.
2. Organisation mondiale de la santé, Centre international de recherche sur le cancer, eds. WHO Classification of Head and Neck Tumours. 4th ed. International agency for research on cancer; 2017.
3. McClary AC, West RB, McClary AC, et al. Ameloblastoma: a clinical review and trends in management. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(7):1649-1661.
4. Yim J, Lee Y, Kim M, et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Bacteroides fragilis Group Organisms Recovered from 2009 to 2012 in a Korean Hospital. Ann Lab Med. 2015;35(6):666-666.
5. Zhang J, Gu Z, Jiang L, et al. Ameloblastoma in children and adolescents. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010;48(7):549-554.
6. Singh T, Wiesenfeld D, Clement J, Chandu A, Nastri A. Ameloblastoma: demographic data and treatment outcomes from Melbourne, Australia. Aust Dent J. 2015;60(1):24-29.
7. Dandriyal R, Gupta A, Pant S, Baweja H. Surgical management of ameloblastoma: Conservative or radical approach. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2011;2(1):22.
8. Hresko A, Burtyn O, Pavlovskiy L, et al. Controversies in ameloblastoma management: evaluation of decision making, based on a retrospective analysis. Med Oral. Published online 2021:e181-e186.
9. Au SW, Li KY, Choi WS, Su YX. Risk factors for recurrence of ameloblastoma: a long-term follow-up retrospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;48(10):1300-1306.
10. Milman T, Ying GS, Pan W, LiVolsi V. Ameloblastoma: 25 Year Experience at a Single Institution. Head and Neck Pathol. 2016; 10(4):513-520.