Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 04/08/2021
Abstract Views: 320
Views PDF: 198
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v503i2.771
Issue
Vol. 503 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Thu Hương, Đỗ ., Diệu Hồng, Đinh ., Thị Thu Hiền, P. ., Anh Chi, N. ., & Như Hải, P. . (2021). ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY OF MANDIBULAR SECOND MOLARS ON CBCT. Vietnam Medical Journal, 503(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v503i2.771

ROOT CANAL MORPHOLOGY OF MANDIBULAR SECOND MOLARS ON CBCT

Đỗ Thị Thu Hương, Đinh Diệu Hồng, Phạm Thị Thu Hiền, Nguyễn Anh Chi, Phạm Như Hải

Main Article Content

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging is a useful method for endodontic therapy. The aim of this study was to identify morphology of second lower molar root canal . CBCT of 346 patients were used. Results were as follows: Number of roots is 3 (1,7%), 2 (97,8%), 1 (0,5%). No difference on the right and left side. 47,7 % of the mesio-bucal root teeth have only 1 root canal, women (56,4%) higher than men (36,1%), the difference . 96,4% distal roots have only one canal. The morphology of the C-shaped canal accounts for 21,7%, of which the C1 form accounts for 14,2% and C2 accounts for 5,5%. No difference between right and left, but more common in women (24,9%) than in men (17,5%).

Article Details

Keywords

root canal, endodontic, cone-beam computed tomographic

References

1. Bing Fan, C-Shaped Canal System in Mandibular Second Molars: Part II—Radiographic Features. Journal of Endodontics, 2005. 32(5): p. 250-254.
2. Bansal, R., S. Hegde, and M.S. Astekar, Classification of Root Canal Configurations: A Review and a New Proposal of Nomenclature System for Root Canal Configuration. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 2018.
3. VERTUCCI, F.J., Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic Topics, 2005. 10, : p. 3–29.
4. Hiền, H.H.T., Đặc Điểm Hình Thái Chân Răng Và Ống Tủy Răng Cối Lớn Thứ Nhất Và Thứ Hai Người Việt Nam . Luận án Tiến sĩ, trường Đại Học Y Dược TP Hồ Chí Minh, 2019.
5. Ahmed H, Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population. International Endodontic Journal. 2007;40:766-71.
6. Pawar A et al. Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molar teeth of an Indian population: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Clinical oral investigations. 2017;21:2801-9.
7. Nur BG, Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars in a south-eastern Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography. European journal of dentistry. 2014; 8:154-9.
8. Martins, J.N, Prevalence and Characteristics of the Maxillary C-shaped Molar. J Endod, 2016. 42(3): 383-9.
9. Sezer Demirbuga, Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2013; 18(4): 737-44.