Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 05/01/2024
Abstract Views: 60
Views PDF: 57
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v533i1B.7858
Issue
Vol. 533 No. 1B (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Phạm , T. A. ., & Trịnh , H. P. . (2024). SHORT – TERM OUTCOME OF RIGHT POSTERIOR SECTIONECTOMY BY THE GLISSONEAN PEDICLE APPROACH FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA. Vietnam Medical Journal, 533(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v533i1B.7858

SHORT – TERM OUTCOME OF RIGHT POSTERIOR SECTIONECTOMY BY THE GLISSONEAN PEDICLE APPROACH FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

Thế Anh Phạm , Huy Phương Trịnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of right posterior sectionectomy by the Glissonean pedicle approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at K Hospital. Subjects and methods: A retrospective description study of 33 patients undergoing right posterior sectionectomy by the Glissonean pedicle approach for HCC at the Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery - K Hospital from January 2022 to October 2022. Results: The male: female ratio was 10:1. The average age was 58.8 ± 10.9 years. Hepatitis B was related in 78.8%. Liver cirrhotic witnessing intraoperative was found in 65.6% of patients. The mean operation time was 133 ± 6.04 minutes. There were no cases of intraoperative complications and blood transfusion. There were no cases of postoperative liver failure. The average length of hospital stay was 9.3 ± 5.2 days; the mean time until gas passing was 3.1 ± 0.35 days. Postoperative pathology: Well – differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma 12.1%, moderately – differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma 69.7%; Poorly – differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma 18.2%. Conclusion: Right posterior sectionectomy by the Glissonean pedicle approach in treatment of HCC is a feasible, safe, and effective method.

Article Details

References

1. GLOBOCAN, 2020.
2. Ruzzenente, A., et al., Impact of age on short-term outcomes of liver surgery: Lessons learned in 10-years' experience in a tertiary referral hepato-pancreato-biliary center. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017. 96(20): p. e6955.
3. Zoli, M., et al., Portal blood velocity and flow in aging man. Gerontology, 1989. 35(2-3): p. 61-5.
4. Wynne, H.A., et al., The effect of age upon liver volume and apparent liver blood flow in healthy man. Hepatology, 1989. 9(2): p. 297-301.
5. Kim, J.M., et al., Hepatectomy is a reasonable option for older patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The American Journal of Surgery, 2015. 209(2): p. 391-397.
6. Shirabe, K., et al., Early outcome following hepatic resection in patients older than 80 years of age. World J Surg, 2009. 33(9): p. 1927-32.
7. Yamashita, Y., et al., Longterm favorable results of limited hepatic resections for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: 20 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg, 2007. 205(1): p. 19-26.
8. tế, B.y., Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư biểu mô tế bào gan. 2020: p. 1-34.
9. Thành, L.V., Nghiên cứu chỉ định và kết quả phẫu thuật cắt gan kết hợp phương pháp Tôn Thất Tùng và Lortat Jacob trong điều trị ung thư biểu mô tế bào gan. 2013: Luận án tiến sỹ y học, Học viện quân y, Hà Nội. 1-123.
10. Hsieh, C.B., et al., Prediction of the risk of hepatic failure in patients with portal vein invasion hepatoma after hepatic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2006. 32(1): p. 72-6.