Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 15/01/2024
Abstract Views: 75
Views PDF: 65
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v534i1.8028
Issue
Vol. 534 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hoàng , M. N. ., & Lê, K. L. . (2024). EVALUATION OF LONG-TERM RESULTS AFTER DUAL-PLANE BREAST AUGMENTATION AT HOSPITAL OF POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 534(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v534i1.8028

EVALUATION OF LONG-TERM RESULTS AFTER DUAL-PLANE BREAST AUGMENTATION AT HOSPITAL OF POST AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Mạnh Ninh Hoàng , Khánh Linh Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Bakground: In Vietnam, the number of breast augmentation surgeries is increasing, so doctors need to research to find the best surgical method for patients. Currently, the Dual Plane breast augmentation method is a highly appreciated and widely used method. Purpose: Evaluate the long-term results of breast augmentation surgery using the Dual Plane technique at Hospital of Post and Telecommunications. Methods: Monitoring 70 patients undergoing breast augmentation surgery using Dual Plane technique at Hospital of Post and Telecommunications from November 2019 to June 2021. Follow-up period is at least 1 year. Results: Only 1.4% (1 case) had complications of breast implant displacement. 94.3% of scars were immature scars. 100% of patients were satisfied with the surgery. There was no case requiring re-intervention after surgery. Conclusion: Dual Plane breast augmentation method performed at Post Office Hospital gives positive long-term results.

Article Details

References

1. Karabeg R, Jakirlic M, Karabeg A, Crnogorac D, Aslani I. The New Method of Pocket Forming for Breast Implant Placement in Augmentation Mammaplasty: Dual Plane Subfascial. Med Arch. 2019;73(3): 178. doi:10.5455/ medarh.2019. 73.178-182
2. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7 Suppl):81S-98S; discussion 99S-102S. doi:10.1097/00006534-200612001-00012
3. Téot L, Mustoe TA, Middelkoop E, Gauglitz GG, eds. Textbook on Scar Management: State of the Art Management and Emerging Technologies. Springer; 2020. Accessed September 25, 2023. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/books/NBK586066/
4. Coriddi M, Angelos T, Nadeau M, Bennett M, Taylor A. Analysis of satisfaction and well-being in the short follow-up from breast augmentation using the BREAST-Q, a validated survey instrument. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(2):245-251. doi:10.1177/1090820X12472980
5. Gryskiewicz J. Dual-plane breast augmentation for minimal ptosis pseudoptosis (the “in-between” patient). Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(1):43-65. doi:10.1177/1090820X12469534
6. Randquist C, Por YC, Yeow V, Maglambayan J, Simonyi S. Breast augmentation surgery using an inframammary fold incision in Southeast Asian women: Patient-reported outcomes. Arch Plast Surg. 2018;45(4): 367-374. doi:10.5999/ aps.2018.00045
7. Lhuaire M, Derder M, Hivelin M, Lantieri L, Hunsinger V. Minimally Invasive Inframammary Breast Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(6): 1126e-1127e. doi:10.1097/PRS. 0000000000006283
8. Lancien U, Leduc A, Tilliet Le Dentu H, Perrot P, Duteille F. Evaluation of satisfaction and well being with Breast-Q© of aesthetic breast augmentations by implants using the “Dual Plane” technique: A serie of 191 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2021;66(4): 314-319. doi:10.1016/ j.anplas.2020.07.008