CLINICAL, SUBCLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENT RESULTS OF LUDWIG’S ANGINA CAUSED BY TOOTH INFECTION

Chí Hiếu Nguyễn , Triệu Hùng Đặng , Tấn Văn Nguyễn , Vũ Hùng Phạm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical and subclinical characteristics of patients with tooth-caused Ludwig’s angina at some certain hospitals in Hanoi during the period from 2022 - 2023 and treatment results of patients in the study group. Research subjects and methods: 30 patients were case series described with a confirmed diagnosis of tooth-related oral floor infection treated at Hanoi Medical University Hospital, Viet Duc University Hospital from July 2022 to July 2023. Results: Patients aged 45 years and older accounted for the majority with 86.7%. The main cause was third molar toothache with 16 patients, accounting for 53.3%. There were 19 patients, accounting for 63.3%, with comorbidity diseases. The most common symptom is painful swallowing with rates of 90%. The most compartment involved is the submandibular cavity (83.3%). Most patients have complications spreading to the surrounding area, made up 70%. All patients received surgical drainage of pus, systemic antibiotics and local wound care. Treatment results were good at 36.7% of patients, 56.67% moderate and 6.67% poor, no patient died. Conclusion: Ludwig’s angina is a dangerous complication of oral disease, mainly due to infection of the third molar tooth. Patients usually arrive when symptoms spread to the surrounding area, with 70%. The main treatment is surgical drainage of pus, with good results accounting for 36.7%, which is still low.

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Thị Xuyên. Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị một số bệnh về răng hàm mặT. Published online 2015.
2. Flynn TR, Shanti RM, Hayes C. Severe odontogenic infections, part 2: prospective outcomes study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64(7): 1104-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.joms. 2006.03. 031
3. Uluibau IC, Jaunay T, Goss AN. Severe odontogenic infections. Aust Dent J. 2005;50(4 Suppl 2): S74-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819. 2005.tb00390.x
4. Wang J, Ahani A, Pogrel MA. A five-year retrospective study of odontogenic maxillofacial infections in a large urban public hospital. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(6):646-649. doi:10. 1016/j.ijom.2005.03.001
5. Ko HH, Chien WC, Lin YH, Chung CH, Cheng SJ. Examining the correlation between diabetes and odontogenic infection: A nationwide, retrospective, matched-cohort study in Taiwan. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(6): e0178941. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0178941
6. Fang M, Ishigami J, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Lutsey PL, Pankow JS, Selvin E. Diabetes and the risk of hospitalisation for infection: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Diabetologia. 2021;64(11): 2458-2465. doi:10. 1007/s00125-021-05522-3
7. An J, Madeo J, Singhal M. Ludwig Angina. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed September 26, 2023. http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482354/
8. López-González E, Vitales-Noyola M, González-Amaro AM, et al. Aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms and antibiotic sensitivity of odontogenic maxillofacial infections. Odontology. 2019;107(3): 409-417. doi:10.1007/ s10266-019-00414-w