PAIN RESPONSE AFTER ENDODONTICPREPARATION BY ROTARY AND RECIPROCATING METHODS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of study was to evaluate ofpain response after endodontic preparation by rotary and reciprocating methods. Subjects and methods: A clinical trial with two groups were prepared by rotary andreciprocatingfile systems (ProTaper Nextand WaveOne Gold) on 36 teeth with endondontic indication in patiens over 18 years old. Pain response was assessed before and after preparation 1,2,7 days with questionnaires and clinical examination. Results: Pain responsebetween two groups of rotary and reciprocating methods was not statistically significant difference before andafter preparation 1, 2, 7 days. Pain response when percusionoftwo groups was also not statistically significant difference before and afterpreparation 7 days. Conclusion: Rotaryand reciprocatingmethods were similarly effective in reducing pain after 7 days of endodonticpreparation.
Article Details
Keywords
Pain, rotary, reciprocating, WaveOne Gold, ProTaper Next
References
2. Wang C, Xu P, Ren L, Dong G, Ye L (2010), “Comparison of post-obturation pain experience following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: a randomized controlled trial”, Int Endod J, 43 (8), pp.692-7.
3. Hou XM, Su Z, Hou BX (2017), “Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with rotary vs reciprocating instruments: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials”, BMC Oral Health, 17 (1), pp.86.
4. Martinho FC, Gomes AP, Fernandes AM, Ferreira NS, Endo MS, Freitas LF, et al. (2014), “Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from primarily infected root canals”, J Endod, 40 (5), pp.625-9.
5. Martins CM, De Souza Batista VE, Andolfatto Souza AC, Andrada AC, Mori GG, Gomes Filho JE (2019), “Reciprocating kinematics leads to lower incidences of postoperative pain than rotary kinematics after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial”, J Conserv Dent, 22 (4), pp.320-31.
6. Cicek E, Kocak MM, Kocak S, Saglam BC, Turker SA (2017), “Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study”, J Appl Oral Sci, 25 (1), pp.20-6.
7. Nekoofar MH, Sheykhrezae MS, Meraji N, Jamee A, Shirvani A, Jamee J, et al. (2015), “Comparison of the effect of root canal preparation by using WaveOne and ProTaper on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial”, J Endod, 41 (5), pp.575-8.
8. Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR (2016), “The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis”, Int Endod J, 49 (3), pp.255-70.