Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 20/02/2024
Abstract Views: 135
Views pdf: 87
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v535i2.8531
Issue
Vol. 535 No. 2 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Trần, C. D., Trần, A. T., Lê, Q. T., Huỳnh, V. M. Q., Trương, T. L. H., Đinh, H. Y., Nguyễn, T. K. T., & Lê, C. M. C. (2024). COMPARISON OF 10-2 AND 24-2C TEST GRIDS FOR IDENTIFYING CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS IN GLAUCOMA AND SUSPECT PATIENTS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 535(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v535i2.8531

COMPARISON OF 10-2 AND 24-2C TEST GRIDS FOR IDENTIFYING CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS IN GLAUCOMA AND SUSPECT PATIENTS

Công Danh Trần, Anh Tuấn Trần, Quang Tuyền Lê, Võ Mai Quyên Huỳnh, Thu Lệ Hà Trương, Hoàng Yến Đinh, Thị Kiều Thu Nguyễn, Cao Minh Châu Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: To assess agreement between Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer 10-2 and 24-2C test protocols for detecting glaucomatous defects in the central 10° of the visual field (CVFDs) in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: 65 eyes of 65 patients with early stage primary open-angle glaucoma and glaucoma suspects were included in Ho Chi Minh City Eye Hospital from December 2022 to June 2023. Method: Each subject underwent perimetric testing using 24-2C SITA-Faster and 10-2 SITA-Fast in random order, and Cirrus OCT imaging. CVFDs on 10-2 and 24-2C (within the central 22 points) test grids required a cluster of 3 contiguous points with p<5%, 5% and 1% or <5%, 2%, and 2% within a hemifield on the TD or PD plot. Cohen’s Kappa (k) was used to assess agreement between 10-2 and 24-2C test grids in identifying CVFDs. Results: Moderate to substantial agreement was observed between 10-2 and 24-2C grids for detecting any CVFD from PD (k=0,568) and TD (k=0,698) plots. Conclusions: Substantial agreement for identifying CVFDs using the 24-2C and 10-2 protocols suggests that may supplant the need for two perimetry regimens for detecting central and peripheral glaucomatous visual field damage.

Article Details

Keywords

glaucoma, visual field, 24-2C, 10-2.

References

1. Tanna AP, Boland MV, Giaconi JA, et al. Basic and Clinical Science Course GLAUCOMA 2020-2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2020:113-130.
2. Grzybowski A, Och M, Kanclerz P, Leffler C, Moraes CG. Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Vascular Risk Factors: A Review of Population Based Studies from 1990 to 2019. J Clin Med. Mar 11 2020;9(3)doi:10.3390/jcm9030761.
3. Kyari F, Entekume G, Rabiu M, et al, “A Population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nigeria: results from the Nigeria National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey”, BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:176.
4. Heijl, A, "Perimetric point density and detection of glaucomatous visual field loss", Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 71(4), tr. 445-50, 1993.
5. I. Traynis, De Moraes C. G., Raza A. S., et al. (2014). "Prevalence and nature of early glaucomatous defects in the central 10° of the visual field". JAMA Ophthalmol, 132 (3), pp. 291-7.
6. Garg A, Hood DC, Pensec N, Liebmann JM, Blumberg DM. Macular Damage, as Determined by Structure-Function Staging, Is Associated With Worse Vision-related Quality of Life in Early Glaucoma. American journal of ophthalmology 2019;194:88–94.
7. Grillo, L. M, et al. "The 24-2 Visual Field Test Misses Central Macular Damage Confirmed by the 10-2 Visual Field Test and Optical Coherence Tomography", Transl Vis Sci Technol. 5(2),15, 2016.
8. De Moraes CG, et al. 24-2 Visual Fields Miss Central Defects Shown on 10-2 Tests in Glaucoma Sauspects, Ocular Hypertensives, and Early Glaucoma. Ophthalmology, 2017.
9. Jung KI, Ryu HK, Hong KH, et al. Simultaneously performed combined 24-2 and 10-2 visual field tests in glaucoma. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1227.
10. Chakravarti T, et al. Agreement Between 10-2 and 24-2C Visual Field Test Protocols for Detecting Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects. J Glaucoma, 2021.