Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 05/02/2024
Abstract Views: 64
Views PDF: 72
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v535i1.8582
Issue
Vol. 535 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Trần , H. Q. ., & Hoàng , M. N. . (2024). SELECTION OF SURGICAL METHODS FOR PATIENTS WITH PEYRONIE DISEASE BASED ON ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENIS: THREE CASE REPORTS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 535(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v535i1.8582

SELECTION OF SURGICAL METHODS FOR PATIENTS WITH PEYRONIE DISEASE BASED ON ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PENIS: THREE CASE REPORTS

Hồng Quân Trần , Mạnh Ninh Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Peyronie disease (PD) is characterized by penile deformity caused by fibrous tissue plaques within the tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa of the penis. The condition of erectile dysfunction makes it difficult to engage in sexual activity, and erection is sometimes accompanied by excruciating discomfort. Surgery still represents the gold standard treatment for PD in the chronic phase, and it aims to guarantee a penis straight and rigid enough to allow the patient to resume penetrative sex with confidence. Choosing the appropriate surgical method must be based on the anatomical characteristics of the penis. Here, we report 3 cases of PD had the anatomical characteristics of the penis were evaluated in detail, from which the appropriate surgical method was selected.

Article Details

References

1. Kadioglu A, Akman T, Sanli O, Gurkan L, Cakan M, Celtik M. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2006;50(2):235-248. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.030
2. Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, et al. The management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med. 2010;7(7): 2359-2374. doi: 10. 1111/j.1743-6109.2010. 01850.x
3. Yachia D. Text Atlas of Penile Surgery. 0 ed. CRC Press; 2007. doi:10.3109/9780203007198
4. Awwad Z, Abu-Hijleh M, Basri S, Shegam N, Murshidi M, Ajlouni K. Penile measurements in normal adult Jordanians and in patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17(2):191-195. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901272
5. Hatzichristodoulou G. Grafting techniques for Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(3):334-341. doi:10.21037/tau.2016.03.16
6. Kozacioglu Z, Degirmenci T, Gunlusoy B, et al. Effect of tunical defect size after Peyronie’s plaque excision on postoperative erectile function: do centimeters matter? Urology. 2012;80(5): 1051-1055. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.037
7. Pryor JP, Ralph DJ. Clinical presentations of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14(5):414-417. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900877
8. Kadioglu A, Sanli O, Akman T, Ersay A, Guven S, Mammadov F. Graft materials in Peyronie’s disease surgery: a comprehensive review. J Sex Med. 2007;4(3):581-595. doi:10. 1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00461.x