Article Sidebar
Views pdf: 115
THE VALUE OF ENDOSCOPY, BARIUM ESOPHAGRAM AND HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY METHODS IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACHALASIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
A cross-sectional study was conducted in 148 patients with suspected achalasia from 9/2020 to 2/2023 in the Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. The mean age was 41.5 ± 14, 37.9% of patients were male. The most common clinical symptoms were dysphagia (85.1%) and regurgitation (75.7%), the proportion of patients having Eckardt scores ≥6 was 60.0%. 140 out of 148 patients had a confỉrmed diagnosis of achalasia based on clinical symptoms combined with the diagnostic imaging methods (endoscopy/barium esophagram/high resolution manometry (HRM)). 81.8% of patients having achalasia findings in endoscopy with sensitivity of 82% but specificity was not high (57%). The sensitivity of HRM was higher than the conventional methods such as barium esophagram and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (87% sensitivity, 100% specificity). The combination between diagnostic methods and clinical symptoms would improve the specificity of diagnosis.
Article Details
References
2. Vaezi, M.F., et al., ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol, 2020. 115(9): p. 1393-1411.
3. Việt Hằng Đào, B.L., & Văn Long Đào., “Bước đầu đánh giá kết quả chẩn đoán và phân loại co thắt tâm vị bằng kỹ thuật đo áp lực và nhu động thực quản độ phân giải cao. Journal of 108 - Clinical Medicine and Phamarcy, 2019. 14(3).
4. Thuy, L.N., et al., Evaluation of clinical characteristics and lower esophageal sphincter pressure on high resolution manometry in achalasia patients after treatment. Vietnam Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering, 2021. 63(1): p. 42-46.
5. Kahrilas, P.J., et al., The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2015. 27(2): p. 160-74.
6. Jeon, H.H., et al., Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Untreated Achalasia. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 2017. 23(3): p. 378-384.
7. Howard, P.J., et al., Five year prospective study of the incidence, clinical features, and diagnosis of achalasia in Edinburgh. Gut, 1992. 33(8): p. 1011-5.
8. Li, M.Y., et al., Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment progress of achalasia of cardia. World J Clin Cases, 2023. 11(8): p. 1741-1752.
9. Jain, M., et al., Retrospective study on symptoms and treatment modalities used and short-term follow up of achalasia cardia in Indian setting. JGH Open, 2020. 4(5): p. 856-859.
10. Rozman, R.W., Jr. and E. Achkar, Features distinguishing secondary achalasia from primary achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol, 1990. 85(10): p. 1327-30.